Forensics report on Dominion machines in Michigan claim ‘intentionally and purposefully designed’ to create fraud

A newly-released forensics report that analyzed Dominion Voting Systems machines in a Michigan county claims they are “intentionally” designed to produce fraudulent results.

“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results,” Russell Ramsland Jr., co-founder of Allied Security Operations Group, said in a preliminary report.

“The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail,” Ramsland continued.

“This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified,” he added.

In early December, Michigan Judge Kevin Elsenheimer ordered a forensic analysis of Dominion machines used in Antrim County following a lawsuit that challenged their results.

According to the initial results, Democrat Joe Biden unofficially won the solidly Republican county. But about 6,000 votes were wrongly tabulated for Biden, an error blamed on a Republican clerk’s programming mistake, not on the Dominion machines. The clerk, Sheryl Guy, claimed responsibility.

But Elsenheimer’s order for the forensic examination wasn’t linked to the clerk’s programming error. Rather, it was in relation to a lawsuit filed by county resident William Bailey that questioned the integrity of the equipment over a proposal to allow for a marijuana dispensary in the village of Central Lake.

Bailey’s lawsuit, which was filed Nov. 23, asserts that three ballots were damaged during Antrim County’s recount, which resulted in the proposal passing by a single vote instead of being defeated by a tie.

Elsenheimer approved Ramsland’s request to release his report on Monday.

Ramsland’s team said it first did a forensic duplication of the county’s election management server before inspecting it. The team also duplicated compact flashcards that were used by local precincts in the Dominion ImageCast system, USB memory sticks used by Dominion Voter Assist Terminals, and USB memory sticks that were utilized for the poll book.

The team used X-Ways Forensics and additional tools such as Blackbag-Blacklight Forensic Software and Virtual Box.

The server was running Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5.3-002 during the election, the report states.

According to the report, Ramsland’s team said there were 15,676 individual events per the tabulation log; of those, more than 68 percent were recorded errors.

https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1338511388076077057

“These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rate proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws,” Ramsland wrote.

“A staggering number of votes required adjudication. This was a 2020 issue not seen in previous election cycles still stored on the server. This is caused by intentional errors in the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, or audit trail,” he later noted.

Follow BizPac Review on Parler!

“Our examination of the server logs indicates that this high error rate was incongruent with patterns from previous years. The statement attributing these issues to human error is not consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more correctly to systemic machine and/or software errors. The systemic errors are intentionally designed to create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots to bulk adjudication,” he wrote.

But Erik Grill, an assistant attorney general, told Elsenheimer he believes the preliminary report is “inaccurate, incomplete, and misleading.” Also, Haider Kazim, an attorney for Antrim County, said the report contains a number of errors officials believe were based on “faulty assumptions and incorrect assumptions.”

Still, Gary Miliefsky, one of the founding members of the Department of Homeland Security and executive producer of Cyber Defense Magazine, said that Ramsland’s team and their report should not be “dismissed.”

“Russell James Ramsland, Jr. and his team at ASOG have the cybersecurity and forensic capabilities and expertise that cannot be dismissed,” he said, The Epoch Times reported.

“In fact, looking at their team, their patents, their experience, we now have a credible analysis that as I predicted, the Algorithms being used in the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed to create systematic fraud and influence election results and in this case, not in the favor of President Trump,” Miliefsky alleged.

Powered by Topple

Jon Dougherty

Comments

Latest Articles