Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
CHECK OUT WeThePeople.store for best SWAG!
U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar’s recent call to “cancel” rent and mortgage payments prompted a well-deserved wave of social media criticism.
The Minnesota Democrat then sparked a round of mockery after she backed her argument by linking to an article elaborating on her proposed bill, the Rent and Mortgage Cancellation Act. While Omar urged her Twitter followers to read up about the legislation in the Market Realist piece, what she apparently missed was the article’s criticism of the act which “could end up being even worse for struggling Americans” than the coronavirus crisis.
“Cancel rent and mortgage payments,” Omar tweeted on Wednesday.
The progressive “Squad” member’s simplistic take, in what seems to be another attack on wealthy Americans, was part of her narrative on getting the federal government to suspend all housing payments until the end of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Cancel rent and mortgage payments.
— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) December 3, 2020
But her call was met with immediate pushback by Twitter users.
Cancel yourself. Maybe go marry another brother.
— #Nats Fan Carla ⚾️ (@LibertyBelleCJL) December 3, 2020
This is the philosophy of a 7 year old.
— LibertyJ (@LibertyJen) December 3, 2020
— Dr Evil (@MD_STAT) December 3, 2020
You just aren’t smart.
— Drew Berquist (@drewberquist) December 3, 2020
When the country starts looking for financial advice from a Somali immigrant in Minnesota, you know we’ve got to be in a very bad place.
— ¡Cisco Kid! (@FlyFrankieJ) December 3, 2020
Omar followed up with another tweet directing users to read an article about her bill, which was introduced in the U.S. House in April.
The piece, published and updated in Market Realist two months ago, addressed H.R. 6515 as “legislation that, if passed, might actually help” struggling Americans who have been trying to keep up with their rent or mortgage payments amid the pandemic’s effects.
You can read about my bill here ⬇️https://t.co/CDtLWUbCSr
— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) December 3, 2020
But Omar apparently did not delve too deeply into the article written by Andrew Krosofsky, who told readers that, like other proposed legislation, the bill’s “details are somewhat confusing,” and that there are problems with “good intentions and poor execution.”
Omar’s bill proposes that rent and mortgage payments, retroactive to April 1, will be eliminated and suspending payments will remain in effect until 30 days after the “official end” of the pandemic crisis.
“As well-intentioned as it sounds, the end result of such an act could end up being even worse for struggling Americans than the crisis that required it. No matter how many provisions are made for the government to reimburse landlords and lenders, it isn’t likely that the reimbursements would be made in a timely manner,” the article explained.
Landlords will have “just as much to worry about financially as the people that live in their buildings,” Krosofsky argued, noting their reliance on payments as a source of income and that thousands may end up being evicted at the end of the crisis when the protection expires.
“Despite the bill’s inherent problems, it has attracted 27 House cosponsors,” he wrote.
“Evicting millions of people during a pandemic would be a moral outrage,” Omar tweeted last month, reacting to a CNN . “Cancel rent and mortgage payments now.”
Evicting millions of people during a pandemic would be a moral outrage.
Cancel rent and mortgage payments now.https://t.co/XIggUrRQvz
— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) November 19, 2020
The article also pointed to another problem with the measure which does not include language setting any kind of income threshold, so anyone can claim to qualify and allege they are unable to make rent or mortgage payments.
Problems with the bill aside, the fact that Omar linked to the article which highlighted its shortcomings and the potential that it could “backfire” on those struggling under coronavirus effects, was fodder for Twitter users mocking the congresswoman and her socialist policies.
Direct quote from that article: “As well-intentioned as it sounds, the end result of such an act could end up being even worse for struggling Americans than the crisis that required it.”
— Freedom and Liberty for All (@trueLiberalist) December 3, 2020
The article you tagged, by market realist, literally says this is a bad idea and will backfire?
— Harley (@Harley04339880) December 3, 2020
It literally says in that article that this bill will most likely cause even more problems. Yet you support it?
— Skylar Wallace (@sky8632) December 3, 2020
I like how the article linked here also doesn’t clearly explain how the the shafted landlords will be reimbursed for their loss of income.
— Anil (@AnilR36) December 3, 2020
Did you read the article? The part where it could backfire?
— 🌵 (@houseof33) December 3, 2020
I honestly can’t believe anyone can be this stupid.
— Kiel Robinson (@KielRobinson) December 3, 2020
How stupid do you have to be to share an article that literally states that the negative side effects are that “thousands could end up evicted” as a result of this legislature? Sounds fun. Escape my responsibilities short term only to end up homeless. Thanks, but no thanks.
— Kelsey Grusczynski (@kelseygru) December 3, 2020
- Family denied food for not having vax card; raw and powerful footage …THIS is how to fight back - September 16, 2021
- Biden jumps on FDA approval: ‘Today, I am calling on private sector to impose vaccine mandates’ - August 23, 2021
- Next time your server asks to see a vaccine card, here’s what to do … - August 20, 2021