‘Boy, Bye’: Tucker criticizes black PBS reporter’s grammar, triggers narcissistic media meltdown

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE


CHECK OUT WeThePeople.store for best SWAG!

Members of the mainstream left-wing press suffered a collective meltdown this weekend after Fox News host Tucker Carlson mocked the allegedly poor grammar of a black “journalist” known for playing the role of victim.

During Friday’s episode of Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” the host played a clip of PBS White House correspondent and frequent NBC News contribution Yamiche Alcindor speaking and then slammed her afterward for her poor grammar.

The clip showed Alcindor spouting the following extremely long sentence:

“So you have President Trump selling this idea that there’s a deep state conspiracy theory against him, that he’s the number one victim in America, so if he gets indicted, if he even goes to jail, he might sell that idea to the millions of people who voted for him, and he might become even more powerful, and that’s what the GOP is really scared about — that’s why you’re seeing not that many people stand up to him.”

After she finished speaking, Carlson took aim.

It’s just unbelievable on every level, a correspondent who can’t speak in a grammatically correct sentence,” he said.

Listen:

It’s not clear what about Alcindor’s sentence was grammatically off-putting. Perhaps he thought it was a run-on sentence?

“Run-on sentences, also known as fused sentences, occur when two complete sentences are squashed together without using a coordinating conjunction or proper punctuation, such as a period or a semicolon,” Grammarly notes.

But Grammarly further notes that a “long sentence isn’t necessarily a run-on sentence.” A sentence becomes a run-on sentence only if separate sentences aren’t joined together with proper punctuation.”

Regardless, Carlson is an equal opportunity critic known for bashing a wide number of “journalists,” Democrat politicians and even Trump allies.

His attack specifically on Alcinor nevertheless provoked a snide “rebuttal” from her:

Calling Carlson, a 51-year-old father of four children, a “boy” seemed rather crude, no?

Her “rebuttal” in turn conveniently brought the wider public’s attention to Carlson’s remarks, triggering outrage and accusations of “racism” and “sexism” from her fellow media figures and “journalists.”

Look:

To be fair, the “Tucker is racist” angle was spouted by Alcindor’s defenders, not her — or at least this time. She has a personal history of crying “racism” and “sexism” whenever she’s criticized or challenged over her habitually BS narratives.

After the Kenosha shootings in August, she smeared alleged shooter Kyle Rittenhouse by falesly portraying him as a gun-slinging loon who’d purposefully opened fire on “unarmed” so-called “protesters.”

In reality, Rittenhouse is a teen who showed up in Kenosha to protect businesses from left-wing extremists and wound up having to open fire in alleged self-defense after two of those extremists attacked and tried to kill him.

Alcindor never rescinded her false narrative or apologized. Nor did any of her fellow “journalists” seek to hold her accountable for lying. But the moment Carlson mocked her for allegedly poor grammar, these same “journalists” rushed to the rescue.

It’s ironic, because the FNC host had specifically been speaking about the media’s relentless narcissism when he bashed Alcindor’s grammar.

After taking aim at her grammar, her continued by saying, “The dishonesty of it. Framing this as another clever conspiracy by Donald Trump. But of course it’s about the media. They’re narcissists. Everything’s about them, of course.”

“They want to keep talking about Donald Trump. They need to keep talking about Donald Trump. And if that means sending people to prison for the wrong political views, it is worth it.”

His remarks had concerned the growing number of high-profile left-wing figures who’ve called for the prosecution and “deprogramming” of the president and his supporters.

Carlson believes the left — including members of the media — support such endeavors because they’d allow them to keep publishing “Trump, Trump, Trump” stories and thus keep their Trump-era ratings going even if Joe Biden is inaugurated as president in January.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles