NY Times too busy for Biden fuss; ‘deep dives’ into Coney Barrett’s adoption of two Haitian orphans

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE

CHECK OUT WeThePeople.store for best SWAG!

The New York Times stooped to another new low in a recent profile of Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett and her adopted children.

The liberal newspaper was slammed for its decision to focus in detail on Barrett’s adoptions of two of her children from Haiti, claiming it is “hard to totally separate” her family and the young children from the political process of her nomination.

“Judge Barrett has talked about their adoptions regularly in public speeches. She was inspired to adopt, she once explained, because ‘there are so many children in need,'” the Times piece written by Catherine Porter and Serge F. Kovaleski stated.

“Just as everything with her nomination, the adoptions have been hard to totally separate from the politics of the moment,” the article continued as it jumped on the smears by the left against President Trump’s nominee who has proven herself more than qualified for the job during last week’s confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Judge Barrett has talked about their adoptions regularly in public speeches. She was inspired to adopt, she once explained, because ‘there are so many children in need,'” the piece went on a it focused on the adoption agency Barret and her husband used as well as including quotes from other families asking “to hear how the kids are.”

(Official White House Photo by Andrea Hanks)

“Advocates hope the Barretts’ story will encourage other prospective parents to come forward. Detractors have criticized as ‘white saviorism’ the judge’s public accounts of her children’s dire situations before they left Haiti,” the Times article claimed.

And in its journalistic pursuit of truth, the Times further added that the adoption agency, A New Arrival Inc. “was decertified in 2017 by an accreditation agency used by the U.S. State Department.”

“That same year, it ceased operations, according to tax records,” the report stated, as if the agency’s demise was a refection on Barrett.

The “deep dive” into Barrett’s family and the adoption of her children was slammed on Twitter.

“Nobody assigned to examine whether Biden’s kid sold access to the VP but we’ve got a full colonoscopy of adopted children,” Josh Holmes, former chief of staff and campaign manager for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, tweeted in response to a comment by National Republican Senatorial Committee adviser Matt Whitlock.

“This should be unacceptable,” on Twitter user declared. “They’re attempting to find dirt on Barrett’s children, presumably to question the legitimacy of the adoptions, because they don’t like her politics or her judicial philosophy.”

Others on Twitter noted how The New York Times blatantly stepped in to push the left’s agenda, ignoring the scandal surrounding Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and his son Hunter.


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Frieda Powers


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.


Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles