News

Cory Booker criticized for constantly interrupting ACB and condescending ‘mansplaining’

October 14, 2020 | | Print Article

Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE

CHECK OUT WeThePeople.store for best SWAG!

To call Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., a pompous ass for his actions Tuesday during the confirmation hearing of Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett might be a kind assessment.

Given the standard set by the left, the “mansplaining” and persistent interruptions on his part could even be characterized as misogyny.

Standards that were certainly in play last week during the vice presidential debate, as Vice President Mike Pence was roundly criticized for talking over Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif. — never mind that the tactics Pence employed are standard in any debate and that, relatively speaking, the Republican seemed to be going easy on his opponent.

From the onset, Booker was all about politics, criticizing the process of confirming a Supreme Court justice so close to an election and while there are Covid-19 infections and “widespread food insecurity.”

The senator claimed most Americans believe she should withdraw her nomination until after the election, and launched into a tirade against President Trump and how he’s “a danger to our democracy,” essentially questioning Barrett’s independence by suggesting she was beholden to the president.

Booker’s first question was to ask Barrett if she condemns white supremacy, and used the affirmative response from the judge to further attack Trump.

He asked if she believes “every president should make a commitment, unequivocally and resolutely, to the peaceful transfer of power,” and whether a president should be able to pardon himself.

“Well, one of the beauties of America from the beginning of the republic is that we have had peaceful transfers of power, and that disappointed voters have accepted the new leaders that come into office and that is not true in every country,” Barrett said. “I think it is part of the genius of our Constitution and the good faith and goodwill of the American people that we haven’t had the situations that have arisen in so many other countries where there have been, where those issues have been present.”

On the issue of self-pardons, Barrett deferred saying that would be “a legal question, that would be a constitutional question.”

The ease in which Barrett sidestepped Booker’s political machinations showed why she was nominated in the first place.

On the other hand, Mediatite’s headline stated: “Amy Coney Barrett declines to say whether Trump should commit to a peaceful transfer of power, has the right to self-pardon.”

Democrats have been using a pending Supreme Court case on the Affordable Care Act as a means to instill fear in the public and spur opposition to Barrett and Booker soon took up that angle, citing Republican opposition to ask if it’s “unreasonable for people to fear” that Obamacare may be overturned with her on the bench.

“Well Senator, I want to stress to you, Senator Booker, as I have stressed to some of your colleagues today that I am my own person,” Barrett replied. “Independent under Article Three. And I don’t take orders from the executive branch or the legislative branch-”

Not getting the response he wanted, Booker interrupted to suggest that Barrett did not understand the question.

“Can I restate my question because I don’t think you’re understanding it… I’m just asking you as an act of empathy, can you understand the fears exhibited by the people we put up?” he said.

In all, according to The Hill media reporter Joe Concha, Booker “interrupted Barrett 9 times in less than 20 minutes.”

At times, Booker appeared to be so focused on getting through his list of political points that he didn’t even seem to be listening to the answers Barrett was giving.

Given the left’s meltdown last week over the vice presidential debate, conservatives gave them a taste of their own medicine.

Here’s a sampling of responses from Twitter:

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

$10
$15
$25
$50
Other
$
Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Tom Tillison
Latest posts by Tom Tillison (see all)

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles