Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
CHECK OUT WeThePeople.store for best SWAG!
Far-left liberal Democrats booed like unhinged, uncultured maniacs Thursday as President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump arrived at the Supreme Court to pay respects to the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Even during a moment of silence for the late justice, the Democrats could be heard loudly booing and shrieking like banshees.
“Vote him out!” they all yelled in unison.
Disgusting behavior from leftists outside the Supreme Court:
They just started screaming bloody murder and chanting “vote him out” as Trump paid his respects to RBG during a moment of silence. pic.twitter.com/iGBjYOtMMZ
— Kelb Hull (@CalebJHull) September 24, 2020
This footage quickly went viral among the uber-elite Twitterati, with some far-left propagandists gleefully using the footage to make dubious accusations about the president’s appearance at the high court.
“They’re booing Trump for pretending to pay his respects to the women who’s legacy he’s currently trying to destroy,” an ostensible propagandist from The Daily Beast claimed.
“Chants of ‘Vote Him Out’ as they pretend to pay their respects to #RuthBaderGinsburg,” another added.
The claim that the president was just “pretending” is conspiratorial hogwash, though it’s unlikely to be fact-checked by anyone at Twitter.
Look at some of the footage and accompanying claims/responses from the Twitterati below:
They’re booing Trump for pretending to pay his respects to the women who’s legacy he’s currently trying to destroy
— Molly Jong-Fast🏡 (@MollyJongFast) September 24, 2020
— Anthony Davis (@theanthonydavis) September 24, 2020
Vote him out. https://t.co/IcHz9jikw8
— Ricardo Baca (@bruvs) September 24, 2020
Trump’s thuggish supporters shout Lock her up. True patriots holler Vote him out. That speaks volumes.
— Jennifer ‘Vote Early’ Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) September 24, 2020
The far-left Democrats also yelled, “Honor her wish.”
After Ginsburg’s death last week, her granddaughter claimed she’d told her that she doesn’t want to be replaced “until a new president is installed.”
It was a highly disturbing, politically charged statement that made no sense. If President Donald Trump, a Republican, wins reelection in November, which is a strong possibility, a “new president” won’t be installed until 2025 …
Moreover, there is no precedent pertaining to the wishes of just-deceased justices. The only known precedent is, as noted by Mitt Romney of all people, that when justices die during election years, “the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own.”
My statement regarding the current Supreme Court vacancy: pic.twitter.com/6YO0dPWWXc
— Senator Mitt Romney (@SenatorRomney) September 22, 2020
See additional footage from Thursday below:
LISTEN: As President Trump pays his respects to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, visitors can be heard chanting “honor her wish,” referring to Ginsburg’s deathbed request that they not fill her seat until after the election. https://t.co/KgNfqa4HZ4 pic.twitter.com/CpkneVEESk
— KRON4 News (@kron4news) September 24, 2020
— Christina Ruffini (@EenaRuffini) September 24, 2020
Chants of “Vote him out!” and “Honor her wish!” outside the Supreme Court as the president arrives pic.twitter.com/lys9EqBuNs
— Geoff Bennett (@GeoffRBennett) September 24, 2020
In response to this behavior, some wondered how the media would have reacted had Republicans behaved like this toward former President Barack Hussein Obama.
Based on the media’s reflexive defense of the former president, they would have no doubt labeled the Republicans “racist.”
Trying to imagine the media coverage if Republicans had done this to Obama while he was paying respects beside a casket. https://t.co/3yeMHfBos9
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) September 24, 2020
Others wondered why the president had allowed himself to be put in this situation. Perhaps because — unlike members of the left — he’d felt that paying respects to RBG was more important than partisan politics?
Over on Fox News, contributor Chris Stirewalt posited a conspiracy theory that perhaps the president’s decision was rooted in “political calculation.”
“I don’t know why he went. He didn’t go to John Lewis’ memoriam. He wasn’t there for that stuff. And for good reason. Right? These people don’t want him there. Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s folks don’t want him there. It’s going to be an ugly scene,” he said.
Lewis wasn’t a Supreme Court justice. He was a member of the opposition party.
“I guess, he’s the president. He can go where ever he wants. And he has security so that he can go do it. But you just wonder what the political calculation was here in going to a place where you know you will be received poorly, going to a place where you know the folks there don’t want you to be,” Stirewalt continued.
“Maybe it’s to get the boos. Maybe that’s the idea. But you can see the intensity that Democrats feel about Ginsburg, about this seat, about this election, about Trump.”
(Source: America’s Newsroom)
FYI, there’s no evidence to substantiate this theory …
Moreover, after news of Ginsburg’s death broke last Friday, the president was quick to issue a statement offering condolences.
Statement from the President on the Passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pic.twitter.com/N2YkGVWLoF
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 19, 2020
Elected congressional Democrats were quick meanwhile to politicize her death.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Jen Psaki panics, asks where’s the Republican ‘bed-wetting’ over Trump being likely nominee - October 1, 2023
- Shocking number of French back limiting air travel, but climate zealots set a CRAZY limit - October 1, 2023
- Former ABC journalist gets just 6 years for child porn – videos included infant being raped - October 1, 2023
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.