Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE.
An initiative that began as an executive order issued by President Barack Obama to allow children of illegal aliens to remain inside the United States cannot be rescinded by an executive order from President Donald Trump.
That’s essentially what the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday, when it struck down the White House’s bid to end the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals program.
In a 5-4 decision, the high court noted that the Trump administration’s decision to rescind DACA was a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, Fox News reported.
Once again, Chief Justice John Roberts joined the high court’s liberals in authoring the opinion, in which he wrote that President Trump’s move to end DACA, which extends privileges to the children of illegal aliens that statutory law does not grant them, was “arbitrary and capricious,” though justices did not rule on the merits of the program in and of itself.
“We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. ‘The wisdom’ of those decisions ‘is none of our concern,'”Roberts wrote. “We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action.”
Roberts wrote that the White House “failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance,” in addition to the impact the recision would have on DACA recipients who were benefitted by the program.
“That dual failure raises doubts about whether the agency appreciated the scope of its discretion or exercised that discretion in a reasonable manner,” Roberts said in his opinion. “The appropriate recourse is therefore to remand to DHS so that it may consider the problem anew.”
Fox News adds:
At issue was a program created under executive order that gave about 700,000 people brought to the United States illegally as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.
Hundreds of “Dreamers” and their supporters had rallied outside the court during the November oral arguments. Some carried signs, such as “Build Bridges, Not Walls.” President Trump at times seemed to be pressing instead for a legislative solution, and had tweeted earlier that morning that if the administration prevailed, “a deal will be made with the Dems for them to stay!”
The White House announced in 2017 it would move to phase out DACA, and even implored Congress to come up with a legislative fix that would benefit those who were covered under the program, but lawmakers refused.
Democrats, who claimed to support DACA and the young men and women covered under the program, also refused to join with Republicans to come up with a bill that Trump vowed to sign.
In arguing against keeping DACA, the Justice Department said the program isn’t working anyway and that it’s illegal. DoJ lawyers said that the president ought to have “absolute discretion” in the adoption of a revised overall strategy for immigration. A dozen states, led by Texas, sided with the administration in repealing the program.
“DACA proponents have argued that Trump’s planned termination violates federal law requiring adequate notice-and-comment periods before certain federal rules are changed, as well as other constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees,” Fox News reported.
In dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote, “An effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision.”
Reaction against the ruling was strong on social media.
@Tomahawkskilla im voting for trump 100% now. No way am I letting DACA stay
— John Donovan 🚀 (@johndonovanboi) June 18, 2020
Roberts is COMPROMISED and has been for YEARS.
— ⭐️⭐️⭐️ Suzy ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@suzydymna) June 18, 2020
President Trump if given the proper power would have made a great deal for DACA recipients, but now they took that away from him, sad!
— Dawn Michael, PhD💗 (@SexCounseling) June 18, 2020
That’s exactly right. People pleasers instead of doing their job!
— stacyesparza (@stacyesparza2) June 18, 2020
The court went full POLITICAL.
— VCgav (@cgav_v) June 18, 2020
Trump MUST be re-elected to replace Ginsburg and Bryer and make Roberts irrelevant.
— Spay & Neuter the Media (@k_ovfefe2) June 18, 2020
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Jan. 6 committee chair Benny Thompson offers a stunning take on potential Trump criminal actions - January 2, 2022
- Life-long New Yorker posts ‘sad’ Twitter ode on post-pandemic Big Apple being ‘shadow of its former self’ - January 2, 2022
- NYPD officer shot in head in police lot as he slept in vehicle between shifts - January 2, 2022
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.