MSNBC’s Chris Hayes was roasted for a tweet peddling what some called out as a conspiracy theory about President Donald Trump and his coronavirus task force.
An effort by the “All In” host to trash the president and his administration for the handling of the global pandemic earned Hayes quick social media backlash on Wednesday.
The most cynical interpretation of all this, one I can’t quite bring myself to accept, is they rolled out the model showing 100k deaths after they knew it would be less than that so they could anchor everyone to that # and take a victory lap when “only” tens of thousands died. https://t.co/hYiUCHhO5g
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) April 8, 2020
“The most cynical interpretation of all this, one I can’t quite bring myself to accept, is they rolled out the model showing 100k deaths after they knew it would be less than that so they could anchor everyone to that # and take a vicotry(sic) lap when ‘only’ tens of thousands died,” Hayes wrote.
He appeared to be accusing the Trump administration of inflating the projected number of coronavirus deaths, reacting to a video of the president talking about the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic and how the goal was to keep the death count to a minimum.
“If we can stay substantially under the 100,000 — which was the original projection — I think we did a very good job,” Trump said at the daily task force briefing on Wednesday.
Though Hayes claimed he couldn’t bring himself to “accept” the theory, he floated it out to his 2.1 million Twitter followers. He was quickly blasted for throwing Drs. Deborah Birx and Anthony Fauci into the mix as part of the “they” in his remark.
The “they” you are impugning in this quack tweet includes Birx and Fauci. https://t.co/3CdPpKzgbX
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) April 8, 2020
*Fauci* announced it. Birx echoed it. Experts.
— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) April 8, 2020
Sure—nice conspiracy theory you have there.
It involves Fauci and Birx as well as the University of Washington and the CDC all lying—–to help Trump
— mallen2010 (@mallen2010) April 8, 2020
Hayes attempted to defend himself as he replied to many of the comments trashing him.
“I think I’d distinguish between the integrity of the model and the good-faith reasons for them using (which I don’t actually really question) and the macabre strangeness of it as this very explicit benchmark of ‘success’ that he articulates over and over as thousands of ppl die,” he wrote in one reply.
“I said I can’t bring myself to accept it!” he wrote, responding to a tweet from Washington Examiner‘s Tim Carney. “But he’s been very, very weird about ‘coming in under the model’ in this unnerving, disassociated way.” (*Language warning)
Yeah, so you know this is a bullshit theory you “can’t quite accept” but you still put it out there anyway because you are FAKE NEWS. You are no different than Alex Jones right now.
I’m thankful 🙏the public in finally starting to see what a bunch of hacks you all are.
— ⚡David Angelo⚡ (@MrDavidAngelo) April 8, 2020
The conspiracy theory “doesn’t quite hold up,” FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver tweeted, prompting Hayes to fire back that “it doesn’t hold up as a matter of the knowability of the future, but there’s a question – unanswered! – about when/how the IHME model became the focal point and the one they chose to walk everyone through *when* they did.”
He continued to spin in a circle as he tried to walk back his comments, claiming he was “saying there’s a narrower question of when and why the WH chose to adopt and publicize the specific model they did when they did.”
But Twitter users saw through his dance routine. (*Language warning)
The “I’m just asking questions” routine. A classic! https://t.co/qHWCp3HL6b
— 𝚒’𝚖 𝚊 𝚑𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚝𝚜𝚊𝚛 (@BecketAdams) April 9, 2020
Annnnnnnd, here it is. They inflated the numbers to make Trump look good! Anybody believe Fauci and Birx are on Trump’s side politically and would knowingly cook numbers to help him? Hilarious. https://t.co/LGfhu0YCng
— Chris Stigall (@ChrisStigall) April 9, 2020
This is an outrageous take. Every bit of reporting from the time suggested Dr. Birx and Dr. Fauci had to talk the President in to accepting that number.
Now you’re attacking their credibility to try and get Trump? https://t.co/cjOYyibSe4
— Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) April 8, 2020
You’re a fucking ghoul.
It makes me depressed that THESE are the people on TV delivering us “the news.” https://t.co/iGRV6qLjLj
— Jason Howerton (@jason_howerton) April 9, 2020
Most sane people would say “Oh good, the original estimates were high.”
— Stephe96 (@Stephe96) April 9, 2020
Can’t wait for your appearance on Tucker to discuss this conspiracy theory, Chris.
— neontaster (@neontaster) April 8, 2020
Naturally, the defense will be “Hey, I didn’t say -I believe it,” because technically he didn’t. But he knows good and damn well a handful of people out there will take it and run with it and the damage will be done. But, on this Holy Week, he can simply wash his hands of it.
— Joe Cunningham (@JoePCunningham) April 9, 2020
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘This is big’: Elon Musk promises release of free speech suppression docs - November 29, 2022
- ‘Are we next?!’ Kilmeade breaks down shady FBI actions, concludes Trump justified in his outrage - August 30, 2022
- Grandfather throws down with aggressive kangaroo that attacked his dogs, but who really won? - June 4, 2022
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.