If front-runner Democrat presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders fails to accrue enough delegates to win the Democrat nomination outright, the Democrat Party as a whole may wind up facing one of the most devastating internal civil wars in its history.
As it stands, if Sanders lacks the delegates needed to win during the Democrat National Committee’s first ballot or vote in July, the nomination process will enter into a second-round during which superdelegates will possess the power to pick the nominee.
The problem for Sanders is that, like many other Democrats, an “overwhelming” majority of superdelegates reportedly oppose his accession to the throne.
“Dozens of interviews with Democratic establishment leaders this week show that they are not just worried about Mr. Sanders’s candidacy, but are also willing to risk intraparty damage to stop his nomination at the national convention in July if they get the chance,” The New York Times reported Thursday.
“Since Mr. Sanders’s victory in Nevada’s caucuses on Saturday, The Times has interviewed 93 party officials — all of them superdelegates, who could have a say on the nominee at the convention — and found overwhelming opposition to handing the Vermont senator the nomination if he arrived with the most delegates but fell short of a majority.”
This is an especially big problem for the Democrat Party as a whole, as Sanders’ growing swath of supporters already distrust the Democrat establishment. They’re the same voters who helped propel President Donald Trump to a victory in 2016 by abandoning the party out of anger over their preferred candidate being robbed of the nomination.
If Bernie made it to the convention with a plurality of the delegates but not a majority and was denied the nomination, it would rip the party apart, plain and simple. https://t.co/SXEXEd3ka5
— Charles M. Blow (@CharlesMBlow) February 27, 2020
If Bernie has a plurality of delegates and votes and superdelegates deny him the nomination, I’m staying home, and I’m sure a lot of other people will too. Party leaders should be aware of this now so they can factor it into their decision. https://t.co/fQq7KXqhyW
— David Klion (@DavidKlion) February 27, 2020
If the Democratic party plans to just hand the nomination to one of the losers, why don’t they dispense with the illusion of democracy and cancel all of the primaries? Would save a lot of time giving up pretending they care about the will of the people. https://t.co/ObxYYO3beU
— John Iadarola (@johniadarola) February 27, 2020
Even if you think Sanders is an extremely risky general election candidate — which I do — this is insane and will lead Democrats to defeat https://t.co/if6wBLSNn9
— Michelle Goldberg (@michelleinbklyn) February 27, 2020
“[I]f I, or anybody else, goes into the Democratic convention with a substantial plurality, I believe that individual, me or anybody else, should be the candidate of the Democratic Party. And I’ll tell you why,” he said during a CNN-hosted town hall Monday.
“It will be incredibly divisive for the Democratic Party if a candidate who has won the support of people all over the country. … All of the candidates are working really hard. And if one candidate comes out on top, to say to the country “you voted for that candidate, oh, but by the way, we don’t think that candidate should be the nominee,’ I think that will be a serious, serious problem for the Democratic Party. And I think it will wreak havoc on that person’s campaign.”
Listen (disable your adblocker if the video doesn’t appear):
Were the nomination process to enter into the second round and superdelegates used to nominate someone besides Sanders, what happened in 2016 could happen all over again — and even more furiously this time, given the senator’s newfound stance on superdelegates.
“Not only would a messy convention fight risk alienating a sizable part of the Democratic base that supports Mr. Sanders, it would also give Republicans ammunition to use in the general election,” the Times noted.
But establishment Democrats are so afraid of Sanders’ lack of viability against Trump that some of them don’t seem to even care.
According to the Times, they “view Mr. Sanders as such an existential threat that they see stopping him from winning the nomination as less risky than a public convention fight.”
“Many feared that putting Mr. Sanders on the top of the ticket could cost Democrats the political gains of the Trump era, a period when the party won control of the House, took governor’s mansions in deep red states and flipped statehouses across the country.”
And it appears they’re not alone in their worries. Last week Politico revealed that fellow presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg “is privately lobbying Democratic Party officials and donors allied with his more-moderate opponents to flip their allegiance to him — and block Bernie Sanders — in the event of a brokered national convention.”
The report spawned mass outrage:
Without even winning a single delegate or appearing on a single ballot, Bloomberg is already preparing for a convention coup. The “best campaign money can buy” is a poster child of how billionaires are buying out our democracy & stealing our future. https://t.co/xjZcIGQgZH
— Dr. Jill Stein? (@DrJillStein) February 27, 2020
The mainstream corporate media is now openly admitting right-wing Republican billionaire Michael Bloomberg is conspiring with Democratic Party leaders to steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders at a brokered convention.
The best “democracy” money can buyhttps://t.co/rWOiG9B56u
— Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) February 21, 2020
We all saw nearly $800,000 that Bloomberg donated to DNC’s joint fundraising committee and funneled to DNC and 44 state party committees. We see how he’s running a jobs program for Democratic Party consultant class.
This isn’t a quiet plot. It’s brazen.https://t.co/bnTHaAm0QH
— Kevin Gosztola (@kgosztola) February 21, 2020
Of course, any potential DNC complications hinge on Sanders performing well-enough to remain the front-runner but not well enough to win the nomination during the first round of voting.
- Fiona Hill: ‘Open civil war’ possible if Trump elected in 2024 because Dems will see win as ‘illegitimate’ - October 24, 2021
- Pelosi refuses to confirm reelection in ’22, assures Jake Tapper ‘we’re pretty much there’ on massive spending bill - October 24, 2021
- ‘You’re a clown’: Chris Wallace dragged after calling Jen Psaki ‘one of the best press secretaries ever’ - October 24, 2021