‘Draconian’ bill requiring parental notification before teaching LGBTQ content in schools under fire

Mary Margaret Olohan, DCNF

Opponents criticized an Iowa bill that would require schools to notify parents before teaching LGBTQ content to children.

Lawmakers introduced the Republican sponsored House File 2201 in January, a bill that would require schools to annually notify parents about any kind of material that discusses gender or sexual orientation. This would then give parents the opportunity to inspect such material pull their children out of certain classes.

The bill is one of 13 pieces of legislation introduced in the Iowa state legislature that opponents are calling anti-LGBTQ, CNN reported Friday.

Republican Iowa state Rep. Jeff Shipley says that the bill is intended to help the parents and school cooperate on what kind of schooling children should receive, rather than forcing parents to home-school because the school does not cooperate.

“Because there are so many unknowns (with gender identity and sexual orientation), it just seemed like common sense to make sure parents are involved,” Shipley told CNN. “Because when parents aren’t involved, they tend to get upset.”

Iowa Pastor Brad Cranston told the Des Moines, Iowa, outlet WHO-TV: “Parents have the right to know when it comes to a controversial issue what their children are being taught in schools they’re paying for.”

But opponents of the legislation warn that the bill is anti-LGBTQ and limits the scope of topics to be discussed in school.

The nonprofit One Iowa Action called the bill “harmful to LGBTQ Iowans” and said that the bill would “restrict educators from discussing sexual orientation and gender identity,” in a Jan. 31 post.

“The bill also would marginalize and discriminate against LGBTQ students by mandating that they and their sexual orientation or gender identity must be hidden and not discussed,” American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) communications director Veronica Fowler told CNN.

Urbandale, Iowa, mental health professional Lorilei Baker suggested to WHO-TV that the bill “assumes children can turn gay by suggestion.”

Other critics suggested that the bill would ban teachers from mentioning that 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg is gay.

“Teachers, rightly, have raised concerns about what would and would not need parental approval, citing examples as fundamental as whether or not they could mention that presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg is making history as an openly gay presidential candidate,” the ACLU’s Fowler told CNN.

Iowa Association of School Boards member Emily Piper told WHO-TV: “What if we’re having a discussion on current events and there’s a presidential candidate who is gay? Can we not have that conversation in the government class?”

LGBTQ Nation ran a story Thursday with the headline, “Iowa bill would ban teachers from saying that Pete Buttigieg is gay without notifying parents.”

The bill’s supporters said that @PeteButtigieg‘s identity is a “controversial topic” that parents should have a right to opt their children out of. #LGBTQ https://t.co/psVqaVVBzC

— LGBTQ Nation (@lgbtqnation) February 13, 2020

Another critic called the bill “draconian” in a Des Moines Register op-ed.

“The potential ramifications of these bills are mind-boggling,” opinion columnist Rekha Basu wrote Tuesday. “Collectively, if they became law, they would have a draconian effect, subjecting LGBT people to hatred and discrimination or forcing them back into the closet.”

For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!