‘White House and white people’: CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin diversity-checks Trump’s legal team

[sharenow]
Screengrab CNN

A sure sign that the Democratic Party’s one-sided impeachment of President Donald Trump is not going well in the Senate was seen Saturday when the party’s CNN allies went back to attacking the president as a bigot.

In effect, because the White House defense team lacks the diversity seen with House impeachment managers — unless the network is declaring Trump guilty over a lack of diversity, which is not out of the question.

CNN chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin characterized Trump’s legal team as “White House and white people,” saying the impeachment trial was “a lesson in the diversity of the two parties.”

Toobin would note the affirmative action at play with the House team.

“You look at the House managers, it was almost evenly divided between men and women. It was — you had two African Americans, you had a Hispanic. I mean, it was all white men today,” he said of Saturday’s arguments by the president’s legal team.

 

He would then dismiss the “two white women” on the White House defense team in a sexist manner, questioning whether they will be “allowed” to speak.

(The women are Pam Bondi, the former attorney general of Florida, and Jane Raskin, a former federal attorney who’s successfully tried organized crime and racketeering cases.)

“There are two — two white women — allegedly on the team, we’ll see if they are allowed to argue,” Toobin said. “But I mean, I think, you know, in a visual medium when you have one side that has a very diverse team and the other side that’s all white men, that says something in and of itself.”

Never mind that the defense spoke for just over two hours, out of an allotment of 24 hours over three days. The two hours occurring on a Saturday.

Lost in the mix, as a social media user noted, was that this was an all-white CNN panel of four men and one woman.

Not surprisingly, the man who fawned over the Democrats’ leading impeachment manager, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., wasn’t impressed with the team representing the president.

Toobin panned the performance by Trump’s personal attorney Jay Sekulow, saying that he “sort of wandered in the wastelands of the Mueller report that didn’t seem relevant.”

He also said deputy counsel Patrick Philbin “is not a spell-binding performer” either, suggesting that he put forth a “particularly weak performance.”

Contrast this assessment to how Toobin gushed over Schiff like a teeny-bopper.

“I thought it was dazzling,” he declared last week. “I thought the way he wove through both the facts of the case and the historical context was really remarkable. It was the second-best courtroom address — since it’s like a courtroom, that I ever heard.”

Here’s a sampling of reactions to the story from Twitter:

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
[sharenow]
Tom Tillison

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles