Arizona Sen. Martha McSally, a combat veteran, lashed out Thursday when CNN senior congressional correspondent Manu Raju confronted her about Democrat demands that the GOP-led Senate consider new evidence going into President Donald Trump’s trial.
“Should the Senate consider new evidence as a part of the impeachment trial?” Raju asked her as she walked through the corridors of Congress.
“Manu, you’re a liberal hack,” the senator replied. “I’m not talking to you.”
“You’re not going to comment?” the correspondent pressed.
“You’re a liberal hack,” McSally reiterated.
Watch:
CNN’s Manu Raju: “Should the Senate consider new evidence as a part of the impeachment trial?”@SenMcSallyAZ: “Manu, you’re a liberal hack. I’m not talking to you.”
Raju: “You’re not going to comment?”
McSally: “You’re a liberal hack.”
???????pic.twitter.com/j8CJhjB3kr
— Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) January 16, 2020
After the footage above went viral on social media, the congresswoman doubled down.
Look:
A) you are.
B) here’s the video. https://t.co/zVgk9pBhdf pic.twitter.com/cfFdotLjFK— Martha McSally (@SenMcSallyAZ) January 16, 2020
The outburst sparked a Twitter firestorm as outraged leftists were seemingly appalled. McSally’s name, along with her opponent Mark Kelly trended on social media as both sides of the political aisle dug in.
McSally is getting significantly outraised by Democratic challenger Mark Kelly.
Getting a fundraising boost from the party after she called a CNN reporter a "liberal hack" this morning. https://t.co/oxdkavNb00
— James Arkin (@JamesArkin) January 16, 2020
Why all the anger? It’s complicated.
For months numerous commentators advised House Democrats to slow their roll and stop rushing through the impeachment of President Donald Trump. But Democrats never listened, and now they’re seemingly paying the price for their arrogance.
Had House Democrats taken their time, for instance, they could have eventually called former National Security Adviser John Bolton to testify before Congress. But now they’re stuck demanding the GOP-led Senate to do their job for them.
Case in point:
The President & Sen. McConnell have run out of excuses. They must allow key witnesses to testify, and produce the documents Trump has blocked, so Americans can see the facts for themselves.
The Senate cannot be complicit in the President’s cover-up. #DefendOurDemocracy https://t.co/TQLJsfn0f5
— Nancy Pelosi (@SpeakerPelosi) January 6, 2020
Likewise, had House Democrats taken their time, they themselves could have presented new evidence concerning Lev Parnas, the indicted former associate of the president’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. Instead, they’re now stuck making demands.
Except of course that, in the opinion of conservatives, Democrats need only perform half of the work, given as the media are ready and willing to perform the rest of it for them, or so the argument goes.
The new evidence includes alleged text messages from Parnas that show him communicating with numerous Trump administration officials and conservative media stars.
It also includes claims from him that Trump’s request last summer that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky look into credible allegations of corruption surrounding former Vice President Joe Biden and the 2016 U.S. presidential election was “all about” affecting the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
“Lev Parnas … implicated the President Wednesday in an interview with CNN in which he said that their efforts were ‘all about 2020’ and not about working in the interest of the United States,” CNN reported Wednesday after Parnas spoke with host Anderson Cooper.
“That was the way everyone viewed it,” he said to the host. “That was the most important thing, for him to stay on for four years and keep the fight going. I mean, there was no other reason for doing it.”
Lev Parnas, Rudy Giuliani’s associate, said their efforts were “all about 2020.”
“That was the way everyone viewed it,” Parnas added, disputing Trump’s claim that the push for investigating the Bidens stemmed from concerns about corruption in Ukraine.https://t.co/qLwZHVZuBB pic.twitter.com/EIL27dtaAZ
— New Day (@NewDay) January 16, 2020
Is this a valid claim, though? Maybe, maybe not, though CNN seems to have bought Parnas’ claims hook, line and sinker, never mind him being a criminal suspect who was indicted last September for planning to direct funds from a foreign government “to U.S. politicians while trying to influence U.S.-Ukraine relations.”
He appears to be as much of a valid source as disgraced former attorneys Michael Cohen and Michael Avenatti, both of whose claims were also broadcast by members of the network, including Raju:
NEW: Michael Cohen gives House Intel new docs showing edits by Trump attorneys to false written statement he delivered to Congress in 2017 about the Trump Organization’s pursuit of the Trump Tower Moscow project into the 2016 campaign season w/@jeremyherb https://t.co/zUwwRQtaUX
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) March 6, 2019
“Yes,” DVD contains evidence of Stormy-Trump relationship, says @MichaelAvenatti to @wolfblitzer. “The tweet is a warning shot. People better be honest relating to this relationship, relating to the bullying tactics,” referring to Michael Cohen and Trump. https://t.co/HLif1XhfvM
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) March 23, 2018
Raju’s also been busy peddling every single thing Parnas has had to say:
Devin Nunes and a top aide “were involved in getting this stuff on Biden,” Lev Parnas says to Maddow. “He knows who I am.”
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) January 16, 2020
Lev Parnas says the “only motivation” for pushing for the ouster of Marie Yovanovitch was to make it easier to push Ukraine to announce the Biden investigations https://t.co/4GAwzGr0Nf
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) January 16, 2020
Parnas says the day after he delivered this message to Ukraine, Pence canceled his trip to the Zelensky inauguration at Trump’s direction https://t.co/4nazHm4fh8
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) January 16, 2020
But does Raju’s reporting necessarily make him a “liberal hack?” It depends.
Was he a “liberal hack” when he confronted antisemitic Muslim rep. Ilhan Omar last year about inflammatory remarks she’d made about the president?
Watch that stunning confrontation below:
Nevertheless, McSally isn’t alone in believing Raju is indeed a liberal hack.
Observe:
Sen. Martha McSally, a Republican facing a difficult election race, lashed out when I asked if she would consider new evidence as part of the Senate trial. “You’re a liberal hack – I’m not talking to you. You’re a liberal hack.” She then walked into a hearing room.
— Manu Raju (@mkraju) January 16, 2020
you are a hack though.
— Alex deGrasse (@Degrasse81) January 16, 2020
she’s right Manu
you never tracked down Democrats to ask them difficult questions
you never hold their feet to the fire
in other words you never hold truth to power with Democrats
don’t you wonder why the ratings on CNN are so bad?— Anji Passion (@AnjiPassion) January 16, 2020
I’m so sorry! We all thought you already knew…
— ❌John Johnson – American Patriot?? (@Onelifetogive) January 16, 2020
Except she’s right, and I’m not even a fan of hers
— Jeremy Frankel (@FrankelJeremy) January 16, 2020
My favorite part is that no one in the comments denies that you are a hack @mkraju.
Also, I think people will actually hear this and like her more.
I might just move to AZ to vote for her. https://t.co/FHeG4RH6OD— an_Achilles (@achilles_an) January 16, 2020
For better or worse, it appears the jury has spoken …
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Trans HS student arrested after disturbing manifesto comes to light: ‘This gun is going to change lives tomorrow’ - April 20, 2024
- Former Letitia James intern among those arrested at anti-Israel protest: report - April 20, 2024
- ATF agents not wearing bodycams during shootout with Clinton airport executive director, Republicans demand answers - April 20, 2024
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!