Sen. Elizabeth Warren is assuring one of the world’s richest people that her proposed wealth tax is not as bad as it seems.
The 2020 Democratic presidential candidate reached out to Microsoft founder Bill Gates, after his criticism of her plans, to promise that, as president, her proposed policy would not cost him $100 billion.
(Video: CNBC via YouTube)
Gates explained at a New York Times/Deal Book conference on Wednesday that, while he is not against paying taxes, he is not sure Warren’s idea of a wealth tax on net worth is something he could stand behind, even if it means not endorsing her against President Trump.
“I’ve paid over $10 billion in taxes, I’ve paid more than anyone in taxes,” Gates told New York Times writer Andrew Ross Sorkin at the forum.
“If I’d had to have paid $20 billion in taxes — fine. But, when you say I should pay $100 billion, okay I’m starting to do a little math about what I have left over,” he said, laughing and adding that he was “just kidding.”
Sorkin asked the 64-year-old billionaire if he would be willing to meet with the Massachusetts senator and discuss his concerns over her proposal to increase taxes on the wealthy.
“I’m not sure how open-minded she is — or that she’d even be willing to sit down with somebody who has large amounts of money,” Gates replied.
He was also asked if, in the event Warren was able to secure the Democratic nomination, he would cast his vote for her or for Trump, despite his past criticisms of the president.
“I’m not going to make political declarations,” Gates said. “But I do think no matter what policy somebody has in mind … whoever I decide will have the more professional approach in the current situation, probably is the thing I will weigh the most. And I hope that the more professional candidate is an electable candidate.”
Warren ended up responding on Twitter, telling Gates that she would be happy to meet with him and would “love to explain exactly how much you’d pay under my wealth tax.”
I’m always happy to meet with people, even if we have different views. @BillGates, if we get the chance, I’d love to explain exactly how much you’d pay under my wealth tax. (I promise it’s not $100 billion.) https://t.co/m6G20hDNaV
— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) November 7, 2019
No word yet on whether Gates will accept the Democrat’s offer but he has not been the only one skeptical — or even critical — of Warren’s policy proposals. The 2020 contender has claimed that her “ultra-millionaire tax” will bring in enough revenue to cover “universal child care for every baby, zero to five, universal pre-K, universal college and knock back the student loan burden for 95 percent of our students.”
Warren’s socialistic economic policy proposals are also reportedly giving Wall Street donors some concern, which is playing out in their reluctance to donate to Democratic Senate candidates.
Wall St donors reportedly withhold Dem donations from Schumer, fearful of Warren nomination https://t.co/gENFsEXJqM
— Conservative News (@BIZPACReview) November 5, 2019
Finance executives, in what is seen as a strong message to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, are holding off in their donations over worries that Warren, who has repeatedly targeted Wall Street, will surge ahead in the race to secure the party’s presidential nomination.
Many other critics have warned that Warren’s wealth tax numbers do not add up and, according to an analysis from a think tank at George Mason University, her plan may not only be unconstitutional but “would certainly come with a number of challenges and negative economic consequences.”
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Minnesota Dems promote bills to ban gas-powered lawnmowers, chainsaws - February 18, 2023
- KJP shows off her contempt for Trump with unnecessary jab during comms director’s sendoff - February 11, 2023
- DOJ ramps up a ‘mere review’ to full-fledged investigation after latest Biden doc discovery - January 12, 2023
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.