If you’re not convinced that the Democrat Party desperately wants to ensure that President Donald Trump doesn’t secure a second term in the White House, you have not been paying attention to their sham impeachment efforts.
They are so desperate, according to New York Times Frank Bruni, that donors in the party are beginning to panic over their current options to take on the president.
“So they’re looking at their candidates — at their front-runners, in particular — with a very withering microscope,” Bruni said Tuesday on CNN’s New Day. “Because the question is who is super-potent enough, rock-solid enough to guarantee us that we’ll get rid of Donald Trump.”
The columnist offered his take on the current front runners, former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.
“And you have a situation here. It’s not just the donors who are concerned, you have two front-runners who are both extremely flawed and extremely vulnerable,” he said. “Joe Biden has seemed very rickety on that debate stage. He’s not raising money the way he should. He’s spending too much money. He doesn’t have cash reserves.”
“And, Elizabeth Warren is to the left of a lot of Democratic voters and a lot of general election voters,” Bruni continued. “So I think the panic here is real. What’s sort of silly is the notion that there’s someone out there in the forest who’s going to solve all the problems.”
Someone like Michelle Obama? Or Oprah Winfrey?
New York Times political correspondent Jonathan Martin also wrote about panic in the party, saying Democrats are “wondering about late entrants to the race.”
Martin said when a half-dozen Democratic donors gathered for dinner last week in Manhattan that “the meeting quickly evolved into a discussion of who was not in the race — but could be lured in.”
He tweeted updates on some options, while noting in a separate tweet concerns “are fairly routine for Dems. Some of the Clinton ‘92 crowd can still cite similar stories (to the month!) from their race.”
NEW: Tis the season
-Bloomberg & Hillary have told folks they’d run if they there was opening
-Kerry has showed signs of regret, is worried about Biden
-Sherrod is getting more calls urging him to reconsider
-Holder still talking about it
-And: Deval!https://t.co/aJZLw3RKOg— Jonathan Martin (@jmartNYT) October 22, 2019
“Bernie’s Army” wasn’t too pleased to hear this, as seen in the response from one of Sen. Bernie Sander’s supporters — recent polling suggests the Independent senator from Vermont is fading.
So Bernie is the front runner and all the lies they tell aren’t panning out. So they think running Michelle will do it? People are getting to know the Obama’s better too.
— berniesanders.com Volunteer (Lucē) (@realityLucelu) October 22, 2019
Byron York, chief political correspondent for the Washington Examiner and a Fox News contributor, tossed out the name “Michelle” as a possible option for panicked Democrats.
Read @jmartNYT on nervous Democrats who look at their presidential field and say: Could anybody else run? Please? Michelle? https://t.co/2dTmiuRe81 pic.twitter.com/mhv7grYoom
— Byron York (@ByronYork) October 22, 2019
One thing is certain, this story explains why the Democrats are pushing all-in on the impeachment scam.
Here’s a sampling of other responses to the story from Twitter:
Party has been on life support since Trump descended the escalator.
— PhuL aF (@PhulAf) October 22, 2019
The radical fringes have taken over the party, the moderates have stayed silent. The radical progressives, anarchist, jihadist , climate crazies , anti Christians and all the rest of America haters!
— GHR (@grosa56) October 22, 2019
Of course the Democrat panic is real.
Their candidates are c-list at best.
No one watches the Dem debates other than news professionals who are paid to.
That’s why Democrats are trying to impeach.
Even they can tell that Trump is doing a great job and should be re-elected.
— Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) October 22, 2019
The Dems couldn’t win a game of open book bingo against @realDonaldTrump!! #TRUMP2020
— Larry Creel (@BAMALARRY) October 22, 2019
Lol ya think? It’s nothing but a bunch of clowns. I thought the polls show everyone beating Trump by double digits? Don’t you trust the polls?
— Liz Bear (@elisebear12) October 22, 2019
Rather ironic the Dem’s in an attempt to wreck Trump, they are destroying themselves, blind hatred is self defeating.
— Greg Gregor (@railwolf23) October 22, 2019
If Trump is that incompetent, why didn’t they stand back and let him fail? If Trump is that corrupt why are they “inquiring” in secret, while leaking one-sided narrative? Their actions speak VOLUMES bc their policies are TERRIBLE & they know it.
— Katy Rez (@Karfrmthhrt) October 22, 2019
All of them really lack a basic but needed characteristic: charisma
— Dan R Kunio國 Sparkman (@DanRSparkman) October 22, 2019
Hence the ‘impeachment inquiry’ to interfere with the 2020 election.
— Proud Deplorable (@HKirsh1) October 22, 2019
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
[email protected]
The longest-tenured writer at BizPac Review, Tom grew up in Maryland before moving to Central Florida as a young teen. It is in the Sunshine State that he honed both his passion for politics and his writing skills.
- Study reveals the mind-blowing cost of illegal immigration. Taxpayers buckle up! - March 8, 2023
- Jon Stewart unleashes vulgar rant on Fox News, conservatives over private communications - March 8, 2023
- Loomer launches Twitter attack on ‘Jill DeSantis’: ‘Pretending to be the Kennedys’ - March 8, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
