Fresh off the controversy of saying religious institutions should lose their tax-exempt status if they don’t endorse gay marriage, Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke is citing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to say churches must support LGBT rights.
Amid the backlash, O’Rourke backed off on his earlier position but continued to pander to the LGBT demographic by saying on Sunday that churches have a legal obligation not to discriminate against gay and transgender people.
In effect, the former Democratic three-term Texas congressman is trying to walk the fence.
“I want to make sure that we enforce those laws,” O’Rourke told MSNBC’s Ayman Mohyeldin. “I’m going to make sure those continue to be our values in this country, that we uphold the law, but that we also respect the freedom to pursue those religious beliefs as you see fit.”
Mohyeldin, who noted that some members of O’Rourke’s party disagree with him, then asked the 2020 Democratic presidential contender to clarify his position on his tax-exemption status position.
“Do you believe that religious organizations in this country should be denied tax benefits, tax breaks, exemptions if they do not agree to perform same-sex marriages?” Mohyeldin asked.
“The answer to the direct question that you just asked is no,” O’Rourke replied. “I see tremendous value in what religious institutions do in this country, not just for their congregants and parishioners but what they do in our communities.”
Of course, when Democrats speak of “communities,” there’s a good chance they are talking about illegal immigrants — which is precisely what O’Rourke was speaking of.
“Annunciation House, a Catholic charity in El Paso which provides shelter to asylum seekers and refugees, has facilitated the reunification of these separated families on our border,” he said. “Of course, they should be able to do that work and, of course, any one of us should be able to worship as we please, believe what we like.”
“But the moment that any nonprofit organization in this country offers services in the public sphere — higher education is a great example, or a health care clinic or hospital — then they must follow the laws of this country, including the law that prohibits discrimination based on any difference, of race, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation, which is the question I was asked at that CNN town hall,” O’Rourke added.
It was at this point that the candidate cited the “longstanding” Civil Rights Act.
Social media users were quick to point out the error in O’Rourke’s ways … here’s a sampling of responses from Twitter:
Religious organizations necessarily discriminate between ideas by nature; therefore it’s a natural right that no government can remove
— regression to the mean (@WokeUpArtist) October 21, 2019
What part of “RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATION” does he not get? And does he serious mean that an Islamic Organization would be penalized for not hiring or firing a Gay or Christian or Jew, etc etc etc???
— Alabama Truth Seeker (@TruthAlabama) October 21, 2019
This is naive. So what you’re saying is that an atheist would have to be hired by an evangelical church. Why would an atheist want to work at an evangelical church? Why force an evangelical church to hire an atheist? Again, leftists finding solutions to problems that don’t exist.
— OrwellsPigs (@OrwellsP) October 21, 2019
In the United States, the freedom to hold any religious belief, or none at all, is considered a basic, unalienable right. The government cannot violate this right. Religious intolerance is unacceptable in a society where everyone has individual freedom.
Citizens Almanac M-76 pg 3— Andrew Gentile (@AndrewGentile15) October 20, 2019
In other words, pro-life organizations should be required by law to support abortion. That’s not tyrannical at all.
— tolmie ✝️?? (@realTolmie) October 20, 2019
The only reason why we have complete separation of church and state nationwide across the U.S. is that we can go and worship whatever we want without a state religion. Also, same-sex marriages are considered sinful in the Bible https://t.co/FzmFczRk8q
— Samuel Wang (@SamuelWang2018) October 20, 2019
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!