While red flag laws have become increasingly popular on both sides of the political aisle since the mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, many conservatives are still warning that such laws can be a slippery slope and don’t quite hold up as Constitutional.
Conservative commentator and consistent Second Amendment supporter Dana Loesch took to Twitter to school supporters of red flag laws, aka Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs). Loesch offered ten reasons why red flag laws are dangerous and unconstitutional.
“#RedFlagLaws are an inversion of ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ The standard of evidence is low and while state laws vary, many different people, not just family, can report you,” she tweeted as her first reason.
This is correct. Standards can vary state to state, which creates the slippery slope problem and red flag laws presume guilt before innocence. If reported, someone can have their freedoms stripped until the government deems them “sane” enough to handle firearms.
Ten reasons why you should oppose #RedFlagLaws, a brief thread.
1) #RedFlagLaws are an inversion of “innocent until proven guilty.” The standard of evidence is low and while state laws vary, many different people, not just family, can report you.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
“You don’t have to be in the room (and advance notice isn’t required) for the petition to be granted meaning you must wait to defend yourself. Most laws provide no penalty for abuse and no state law allows for civil cause of action against false accusers,” Loesch continued.
This is also an issue with specific red flag laws. They are open to abuse and those who abuse them face no specific consequences and it also strips the accused of representation, which is fundamental to the American justice system.
2) You don’t have to be in the room (and advance notice isn’t required) for the petition to be granted meaning you must wait to defend yourself. Most laws provide no penalty for abuse and no state law allows for civil cause of action against false accusers.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
Loesch then gave a scary fact about how long things can drag out when someone is stripped of their guns and investigated.
“Time varies as to how long until respondents can have their day in court. A study conducted on Indiana’s law, which said 14 day wait, revealed that the average wait was 9 months. Rights delayed are rights denied,” she tweeted.
3) Time varies as to how long until respondents can have their day in court. A study conducted on Indiana’s law, which said 14 day wait, revealed that the average wait was 9 months. Rights delayed are rights denied.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
The laws have also not led to a reduction in crime in the places that they are used, noted Loesch.
“@davekopel, who has done excellent research on this, has noted that of the four states with the oldest gun confiscation laws, Connecticut, Indiana, California, and Washington, no research has revealed any statistical reduction in crime,” she tweeted.
4) @davekopel , who has done excellent research on this, has noted that of the four states with the oldest gun confiscation laws, Connecticut, Indiana, California, and Washington, no research has revealed any statistical reduction in crime. #RedFlagLaws
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
“(Also still No. 4) Furthermore, Kopel notes that nearly 1/3 of such orders are improperly issued against,” she then added.
(Also still No. 4) Furthermore, Kopel notes that nearly 1/3 of such orders are improperly issued against innocent people.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
They can also leave people defenseless…
“No advance notice is given ahead of serving a #RedFlag order. That worked out horribly for Maryland resident Gary Willis, who was shot and killed when answering his door early morning before the sun was up. This puts LEO in a HORRIBLE position of enforcing these orders,” Loesch wrote.
5) No advance notice is given ahead of serving a #RedFlag order. That worked out horribly for Maryland resident Gary Willis, who was shot and killed when answering his door early morning before the sun was up. This puts LEO in a HORRIBLE position of enforcing these orders.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
They can also ruin lives…
“Counsel is not provided (Blumenthal draft does, it’s of little solace considering), meaning you could be like FL man Jonathan Carpenter, who is waging an expensive court battle to clear his name and reclaim his property because his name was too similar to a drug dealer’s,” reported Loesch.
6) Counsel is not provided (Blumenthal draft does, it’s of little solace considering), meaning you could be like FL man Jonathan Carpenter, who is waging an expensive court battle to clear his name and reclaim his property because his name was too similar to a drug dealer’s.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
John Carpenter is a Florida resident who was completely abused by the government. A woman put in a complaint about her drug dealer, who happened to have the same name as Carpenter. Police arrived at Carpenter’s house and took his guns. It wasn’t until he could actually show up to court that police realized the mistake they had made.
Without actual charges, red flag laws also focus too heavily on guns — to the detriment of the accused…
“We aren’t arresting people, we’re arresting guns. State laws ignore the very reason the petition was granted in the first place: danger resulting in violence or mental instability. No mental evaluations given, no charges for a crime,” Loesch tweeted.
7) We aren’t arresting people, we’re arresting guns. State laws ignore the very reason the petition was granted in the first place: danger resulting in violence or mental instability. No mental evaluations given, no charges for a crime.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
Loesch’s final points hit on practical problems, like the violation of civil rights, as well as the issue of what exactly is done with confiscated firearms.
8) How will confiscated firearms be stored? Local police will be tasked with figuring out storage and bearing the cost of any liability or insurance — at a time when some struggle with budgets to afford body cams.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
9) This isn’t just about the 2nd Amendment. It doesn’t matter if you’re a “gun nut” or even own guns. The deconstruction of due process calls into question your 5th and 14th Amendment rights, too.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
10) Lastly (not really, but I’m sticking to 10), if there is enough evidence to strip you of your rights THERE IS ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CHARGE YOU or commit you. There are NUMEROUS other options to start fixing this problem WITHOUT sacrificing due process.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
Loesch then offered alternatives to red flag laws.
Let’s start by:
– demanding all agencies comply with reporting prohibited possessors to the federal database to stop ineligible people at point of sale.
– demanding prosecutors stop reducing charges and judges issuing weak sentences for felony gun crimes & reduce recidivism…— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
… and let’s demand that schools stop coddling dangerous offenders. When kids make rape lists on bathroom walls, have them evaluated. When they message classmates threatening to kill them, that’s actionable, arrest them. ENFORCE THE LAW.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 11, 2019
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Alleged child molester becomes suspect in assault against 8-yr-old after bail-out from ‘freedom’ charity - December 6, 2019
- MSNBC analyst announces she’s running for Judge Jeanine’s old DA seat: ‘She will not be my role model’ - December 6, 2019
- ‘Get your words straight, jack!’ Biden loses it when man asks about Burisma, challenges him to ‘pushup’ contest - December 5, 2019
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!