School board has last-minute change of heart over George Washington mural

The San Francisco school board voted this week to cover a George Washington mural at a local high school that depicts images of slavery and the death of a Native American.

The 13-panel mural is called “Life of Washington” and though it will be preserved, it will be covered by panels that show “the heroism of people of color in America, how we have fought against, and continue to battle discrimination, racism, hatred, and poverty.”

(Screenshot from YouTube)

The school board voted 4-3 on the issue and the board president suggested the new panels.

The board previously voted in June to paint over the mural.

“I brought it back so if you’re upset with somebody, you can be upset with me,” school board president Steve Cooke said of the new plan.

“I think we all agree that the murals depicts a history of the country that is hard to see and everyone agrees that that history is racist,” Cook said to KPIX. “I think where we disagree is if it’s appropriate for a school site.”

“Lethal Weapon” actor and political activist Danny Glover, who is a San Francisco native, had previously spoken to the press about the issue and he actually wanted the mural to remain up, saying art is meant to make people “uncomfortable” sometimes.

“You have to feel uncomfortable to sense what the past is and how the past is connected to the future, the present and the future,” the actor said.

In a public statement, the actor compared covering up or removing the mural to “book burning.”

“To destroy them or block them from view would be akin to book burning,” he said. “We would be missing the opportunity for enhanced historic introspection this moment has provided us.”

“It is a racist mural,” Virginia Marshall, who’s with the Alliance of Black School Educators, told KTVU about the mural. “My history should not be racist but it is. I came from slaves.”

The mural itself is a complicated matter. It was painted in 1935 and 1936 by Russian immigrant Victor Arnautoff and the whole point of the 1,600-square work was to criticize Washington’s legacy.

Critics of the mural have blasted it as racist and said it is inappropriate for students to see.

“The murals never bothered me,” one student said about the mural, according to SF Chronicle. “In fact, I bet that half of the kids who go to the school never even look up at them when they walk by.”

Many have taken to social media to criticize the covering of the mural.

Fox News host Laura Ingraham called it “the end of history” in a tweet.

“Soo… San Francisco is number one in art censorship now?? I can’t believe this is what we’re teaching our high school students now. pathetic,” another Twitter user wrote on the matter.

“It’s a shame we are destroying our history and our heritage. Our founders were honorable men who laid the foundation for the greatest country on earth and in recorded history. All Americans are the true losers for these actions,” another added.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles