The political correctness waters have apparently gotten too choppy for the New York Times, as the newspaper has decided it will stop publishing political cartoons in its international edition.
Either that, or The Times finds it a little too difficult to draw a line when it comes to anti-Semitic content.
Times’s editorial page editor James Bennet released a statement announcing that as of July 1, the paper would officially stop publishing editorial cartoons — a move they have been mulling over for more than a year, he said.
“We plan to continue investing in forms of Opinion journalism, including visual journalism, that express nuance, complexity and strong voice from a diversity of viewpoints across all of our platforms,” Bennet said in the release.
Our statement in response to ending daily political cartoons in the international edition of The New York Times. pic.twitter.com/FcagTxEZJ9
— NYTimes Communications (@NYTimesPR) June 10, 2019
The decision was made to bring the international edition of the paper in line with the domestic edition, which doesn’t run political cartoons, Bennet explained.
Not lost in the mix is that the move comes after The Times was forced to apologize for running an abhorrent anti-semitic cartoon in its international edition in April.
The cartoon showed Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s head attached to the body of a dog. Wearing a collar with a Star of David on it, Netanyahu was being walked by President Donald Trump, who is wearing a kippah.
NYT runs anti-semitic cartoon, apologizes for serious ‘error of judgment’ https://t.co/xwoYXTjXLH
— Conservative News (@BIZPACReview) April 27, 2019
The cartoon, drawn by Portuguese cartoonist António Moreira Antunes, was a poor attempt at criticizing America’s relationship with Israel.
The apology read: “A political cartoon in the international print edition of The New York Times … included anti-Semitic tropes, depicting the prime minister of Israel as a guide dog with a Star of David collar leading the president of the United States, shown wearing a skullcap. The image was offensive, and it was an error of judgment to publish it. It was provided by The New York Times News Service and Syndicate, which has since deleted it.”
Patrick Chappatte, an editorial cartoonist for the Times’s international edition, said in a blogpost that was published before Bennet’s statement that the decision was a result of the “widespread outrage” that followed the Netanyahu/Trump cartoon.
THE NEW YORK TIMES WILL END ALL POLITICAL CARTOONS I just learned, weeks after they published a syndicated Netanyahu cartoon that caused a scandal. For me, this is the end of an adventure that began 20 years ago. But the stakes are much higher. READ HERE: https://t.co/o8y43v88Yd pic.twitter.com/NBH0uyw9Jf
— Chappatte Cartoons (@PatChappatte) June 10, 2019
“Last week, my employers told me they’ll be ending in-house political cartoons as well by July,” Chappatte wrote. “I’m putting down my pen, with a sigh: that’s a lot of years of work undone by a single cartoon – not even mine – that should never have run in the best newspaper of the world.”
“I’m afraid this is not just about cartoons, but about journalism and opinion in general,” he added. “We are in a world where moralistic mobs gather on social media and rise like a storm, falling upon newsrooms in an overwhelming blow.”
The cartoonist denounced Twitter as “a place of furor, not debate,” while calling for “counter-measures.”
“This requires immediate counter-measures by publishers, leaving no room for ponderation or meaningful discussions,” Chappatte said. “Twitter is a place for furor, not debate. The most outraged voices tend to define the conversation, and the angry crowd follows in.”
Anti-Semitic content aside, much of this may fall under predictable consequences, given the suffocating intolerance on the left in post-Obama America.
Here’s a sampling of the online responses, which includes lots of criticism from both sides of the debate — the cost-saving aspect of the decision was also noted in an age where newspapers are struggling to stay afloat.
So you chose conformity over integrity?
— Lars on Mars (@cafefuture) June 11, 2019
Cutting off political cartoons (is it because you guys think that they are too complicated for your readers?) is just one step in the ladder leading to irrelevance.
— Alonk (@KurzAlon) June 11, 2019
— doug1105 (@doug1105) June 11, 2019
Once again you are afraid of offending. Political cartoons are supposed to be controversial. I have always wondered why there are no political cartoons on page one.
— Terence (@sifigh) June 11, 2019
Yeah, but it's cheaper all around to just not run the cartoons, so it's entirely predictable that's what the Times would choose to do.
— Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright (@PotterCatsmeat) June 10, 2019
It’s a shame that the debate has closed down to “well, you can have either racism, or total censorship, with nothing in between”. Seems to me that that is on the NYT…
— James Harvey 🏳️🌈 (@keepof4worlds) June 11, 2019
Latest posts by Tom Tillison (see all)
- Who can replace Sarah Sanders? Big names emerge with top contender dubbed ‘stone cold killer’ - June 14, 2019
- Bitter libs try to hijack President Trump’s b-day, but can’t stop flood of well-wishes from pouring in - June 14, 2019
- ‘Crime happens’: Castro’s response to woman whose SS# was stolen by illegal immigrant epitomizes Dems - June 14, 2019