Dem leaders hold urgent conference call to address impeachment. Maxine Waters will now fall in line.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 21: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), C, speaks as U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) , L, and Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) stand at a news conference criticizing President Donald Trump's Wall Street policies on Capitol Hill on February 6, 2017 in Washington, D.C. President Trump is making his first visit to U.S. Central Command and U.S. Special Operations Command today at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
(FILE PHOTO by Mario Tama/Getty Images)

Despite boisterous calls for impeachment by some congressional Democrats, the party as a whole appears to be mostly ambivalent about the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump.

Even House Financial Services Committee chair Maxine Waters, who’s been obsessively shouting “Impeach 45!” for two years straight, seems notably less than enthused, according to Fox News‘ sources.

The sources confirmed late Monday that during a private conference call held earlier by congressional Democrat leaders, Waters had said “that while she personally favored going forward with impeachment proceedings, she was not pushing for other members to join her.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi meanwhile reportedly cautioned that while it’s imperative that Democrats “save our democracy,” saving it via impeachment may not be the best option.

“We have to save our democracy,” she said, according to Fox’s sources. “This isn’t about Democrats or Republicans. It’s about saving our democracy. If it is what we need to do to honor our responsibility to the Constitution — if that’s the place the facts take us, that’s the place we have to go. We don’t have to go to articles of impeachment to obtain the facts, the presentation of facts.”

Her rhetoric suggests that she wants the party to dig up more dirt to use against Trump going into 2020. It also seems to make clear that all the noise over impeachment is just that, noise.

“Waters’ hesitation and Pelosi’s remarks signaled clearly that, for the time being, any impeachment effort would struggle to gain steam,” Fox pointed out. “Just last week, Waters, D-Calif., took a far more aggressive tone, charging that ‘Congress’ failure to impeach is complacency in the face of the erosion of our democracy and constitutional norms?”

Apparently, that was just Waters spouting BS again. BS is practically her trademark.

The problem for Democrats is that this desire to just investigate isn’t shared by all congressional Democrats. The party’s radical freshmen members — including Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley– have signaled that they desire impeachment.

Several Democrat presidential candidates have issued similar statements.

“There is no political inconvenience exception to the United States Constitution,” Democrat candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren said at a CNN town hall Monday. “If any other human being in this country had done what’s documented in the Mueller report, they would be arrested and put in jail.”

FYI, the same can be said of failed 2016 Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton …

Candidate Sen. Kamala Harris was even more blunt.

“I believe Congress should take the steps towards impeachment,” she said during the same town hall.

Ahead of the conference call Monday, Pelosi reportedly released a memo to her junior colleagues.

“While our views range from proceeding to investigate the findings of the Mueller report or proceeding directly to impeachment, we all firmly agree that we should proceed down a path of finding the truth,” she reportedly wrote. “It is also important to know that the facts regarding holding the president accountable can be gained outside of impeachment hearings.”

“Whether currently indictable or not, it is clear that the president has, at a minimum, engaged in highly unethical and unscrupulous behavior which does not bring honor to the office he holds.”

According to Fox, during the conference call, she “urged colleagues to read the letter carefully.”

It seems as if her letter — as well as her request that all congressional Democrats read it “carefully” — was a way of her telling the party’s more raucous members to shut up.


This apparent split over impeachment puts the party in a vulnerable position, Fox News commentator Chris Stirewalt argued Monday on “The Daily Briefing with Dana Perino.”

“Democrats had been helped by ‘well, we’re waiting for Mueller,'” he said. “Well, now that Mueller is here and we have the report … as they speak to radicals, as they speak to those who say we have to impeach now, they don’t have that same tool in their bag.”

“For a long time Pelosi could say we’re not going to do anything til after the report and then we’ll make a judgment. Now the pressure’s on. They’re going to force them to make a decision, and that puts a majority of democrats in an uncomfortable position.”


National Journal political editor Josh Kraushaar appears to agree.

In an op-ed he wrote over the weekend, he reportedly warned, “One of the most reliable maxims in politics is that the party that’s divided is the one that’s losing. And on the issue of how to react to the report, the Democrats are split on the direction going forward.”



Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Vivek Saxena


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles