Sen. Lindsey Graham blocked a resolution that unanimously passed in the House to release special counsel Robert Mueller‘s final report to the public.
The South Carolina Republican and Judiciary Committee chairman objected to the nonbinding resolution after a refusal by Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer to amend it by calling for a new special counsel to be appointed to investigate the Justice Department’s misconduct in handling the Hillary Clinton email probe and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications.
“There are a lot of Americans,” Graham said from the Senate Floor Thursday, “that believe what happened in 2016 with the Clinton e-mail investigation and the FISA warrant against Carter Page showed corruption at the highest level of government.”
“I agree that there’s more than smoking guns here. There is overwhelming evidence that somebody outside the political system should look into. I can’t find anybody much on the other side who seems to give a damn about that,” Graham continued.
As currently constructed, I cannot support the House-passed resolution calling for the release of the Mueller report.
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) March 14, 2019
However, I would agree to the resolution with a simple change –
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) March 14, 2019
— it be amended to call for the appointment of a Special Counsel to:
* Investigate alleged misconduct around the handling of the Clinton email investigation.
* Investigate the abuse of the FISA warrant process against Mr. Carter Page.
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) March 14, 2019
He noted that while he supported Mueller’s probe into alleged Russian collusion in the 2016 election, he had a major problem with the way Clinton-related scandals were not addressed.
“Was there two systems of justice in 2016? One for the Democratic candidate and one for the Republican candidate?” Graham asked.
“How in the world could the investigation get so off track that the two people in charge of it openly talked about making sure that there was an insurance policy against Trump if he won, and openly exposed support for Clinton, how do you interview Clinton the way she was interviewed?” The GOP senator asked.
“If the shoe were on the other foot…All hell would pay,” he said. “Any American out there who did what Secretary Clinton did, you’d be in jail now.”
“The question I want to know is, does anybody other than me believe that?” Graham added, calling for someone “to look at what happened on the other side and find out if the FBI and the DOJ had two systems, one supporting the person they wanted to win, and one out to get the person they wanted to lose. Some of these people have been fired for lying and it’s now time to have a special counsel looking all things 2016, not just Trump.”
I have been calling for a Special Counsel to investigate these matters for more than a year and one should have been appointed a long time ago.
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) March 14, 2019
I believe we owe it to the American people to look at ALL potential misconduct related to 2016 campaign investigation, not just some.
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) March 14, 2019
Mr. Mueller has been allowed to do his job.
It is past time for someone to look at the other side of the political coin.
— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) March 14, 2019
Schumer had called for unanimous consent on the resolution in the Senate just hours after it passed in the House with a 420-0 vote, The Hill reported.
“There is no good reason, no good reason that the special counsel’s report should not be made public. The American people are overwhelmingly for the report being made public. They have a right to see it. No one should stand in the way of that,” the New York Democrat said from the Senate floor.
After Graham’s objection, Schumer accused his colleague of using a “pretext” to block the Mueller resolution which would release to the public any of the reports Mueller provides to Attorney General William Barr, except for classified material. The full report would also be released to Congress.
“I have absolutely no idea why a member of this body would object to this basic level of transparency whatever their concern or other issues,” Schumer said.
Though Mueller has not indicated anything publicly about the timing of a report, speculation has mounted following the recent departure of some of the team, including prominent prosecutor, Andrew Weissmann, who headed up Mueller’s case against former President Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.
Buzz of Mueller probe ending catches like wildfire amid reports top-dog Weissmann is stepping down https://t.co/BztsD3iqXn pic.twitter.com/76ze2FOzFY
— Conservative News (@BIZPACReview) March 14, 2019
Graham’s vote to block Thursday’s resolution sparked a backlash from Democrats as mainstream media reported that he declared he didn’t want the Mueller report to go public,
Lindsey Graham has gone completely off the deep end. I also think he is misjudging his voters. SC voters are very conservative but they don’t like pandering incompetence any more than any other voters. https://t.co/WYBHcewrLc
— Howard Dean (@GovHowardDean) March 15, 2019
Graham blocks vote for public release of Mueller report – CNN Video #mueller #report #cnn https://t.co/ygdzAjIStz pic.twitter.com/lMwzPzNyyk
— UniverseNews.Site (@universenews35) March 14, 2019
Many Twitter users saw through the liberal smokescreen, however, and backed Grahms’ call for another investigation.
About time
— Bryan Panella (@flippy181) March 15, 2019
Yes, prosecute. This must never happen again.
The general public would never get away with such crimes and neither should our elected leaders.— Deplorable As Hell (@RonTitus5) March 15, 2019
My confidence in the FBI will never be restored until a complete, full and fair disclosure of all illegal activities and the guilty parties is made to the American people. Otherwise, its still nothing but a Democratic Party Goon Squad. #RNRTN
— Wayne Emery (@WayneEEmery) March 15, 2019
— scott ganca (@bigguns111) March 15, 2019
Agree completely! And quite frankly it’s about d&*n time!!!
— Joshua Alent (@joshalent) March 15, 2019
If there was an investigation into the FBI and DOJ, a real investigation not a phony one, it would never end. So many skeletons!
— conservativeamerica (@conser_usa) March 15, 2019
I agree whole heartedly! If the dems are going to investigate the president from the cradle then I think everyone in office needs to be investigated! I want to know how they became millionaires while in office. If Obama’s FBI and DOJ are crooks so are some dems!
— Deb Wagner (@spiritkeeper52) March 15, 2019
Been saying that for 2 years. Why nothing done?
— Deanna❌ (@DeannaDeanna061) March 15, 2019
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Minnesota Dems promote bills to ban gas-powered lawnmowers, chainsaws - February 18, 2023
- KJP shows off her contempt for Trump with unnecessary jab during comms director’s sendoff - February 11, 2023
- DOJ ramps up a ‘mere review’ to full-fledged investigation after latest Biden doc discovery - January 12, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.