Contents of various Department of Justice records obtained this week by the watchdog group Judicial Watch via a Freedom of Information Act filed last year suggest that the FBI interacted with both the State Department and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s team in potentially sinister ways just prior to the general election on Nov. 8, 2016.
The first major revelation gleaned from the documents is that on the very same day that then-FBI Director James Comey essentially reopened the investigation into Clinton over her illicit use of a private email server, the bureau’s general counsel spoke with Clinton’s personal lawyer David Kendall.
BREAKING:Top FBI Lawyer Talked to Hillary Clinton’s Personal Lawyer about Comey & Weiner Laptop Clinton Emails Just Days Before Election.WIll DOJ/FBI ever do honest investigation of Clinton email misconduct? Again, @JudicialWatch doing the heavy lifting…https://t.co/4jx7z1gJx0 pic.twitter.com/2qpIrpyzNN
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) February 11, 2019
According to Judicial Watch, within hours of Comey announcing to Congress on Oct. 28 that the bureau had found additional potentially classified Clinton emails on disgraced former congressman Anthony Weiner’s laptop, Kendall specifically asked to speak with FBI general counsel James Baker.
Baker reportedly accepted the request and then sent out an email memo informing other senior members at the bureau about his discussion with Kendall. The next day then-FBI special agent Peter Strzok reportedly scheduled a conference call about the matter.
Eight days after this conference call, Comey announced that his review of Weiner’s laptop content had not changed his “conclusion” that Clinton shouldn’t be prosecuted.
While the discovery regarding Baker’s correspondence with Kendall proves nothing by itself, the other revelations unearthed by Judicial Watch give a strong appearance of impropriety
First, it was Strzok — who was booted from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian collusion in 2017 and then fired from the bureau in 2018 over the anti-Trump text messages he’d exchanged with his paramour, then-FBI attorney Lisa Page — who examined Weiner’s laptop.
“[Redacted], Jon and I completed our review of all of the potential HRC work emails on the [Anthony Weiner] laptop. We found no previously unknown, potentially classified emails on the media,” he reportedly wrote to senior FBI officials on Nov. 6, the day Comey closed the investigation.
Trump takes a victory lap about belated Strzok firing, but he asks one serious question … https://t.co/BD4Wy9ugi3 pic.twitter.com/30NfGDrUQe
— Conservative News (@BIZPACReview) August 13, 2018
That was a lie, according to Judicial Watch: “[T]here were at least 18 classified emails found on the Weiner laptop by the FBI. Paul Sperry’s RealClear Investigations report revealed that only 3,077 of the 340,000 emails ‘were directly reviewed for classified or incriminating information.'”
Second, months earlier Page sent an email “concerning a potential quid-pro-quo between the State Department and the FBI — in which the FBI would agree to downgrade the classification level of a Clinton email in exchange for more legal attache positions that would benefit the agency abroad,” as reported by Fox News.
Though there’s reportedly no evidence to prove that the offer ever went through, the fact that the offer was ever even mean made is stunning unto itself.
Combined, these revelations suggest that the Clinton investigation was fixed, Judicial Watch Tom Fitton argued in a video statement published Monday.
Listen:
“It is big news that, just days before the presidential election, Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer pressured the top lawyer for the FBI on the infamous Weiner laptop emails,” he said.
“These documents further underscore that the fix was in for Hillary Clinton. When will the Justice Department and FBI finally do an honest investigation of the Clinton email scandal?”
While the DOJ has shown no signs that it plans to reopen the Clinton investigation, Judicial Watch continues to push for more information.
“Last month, United States District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that discovery can begin in Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, and Clinton aides will now be deposed under oath,” the watchdog group announced Monday.
“Senior officials — including Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, and FBI official E.W. Priestap — will now have to answer Judicial Watch’s written questions under oath. The court rejected the DOJ and State Department’s objections to Judicial Watch’s court-ordered discovery plan.”
The goals now are to determine whether Clinton purposefully used a private email server to hide her activities, whether the State Department illegally tried to protect her from prosecution and whether The State Department’s cooperation with Judicial Watch has been in good faith.
Whether or not Clinton will ever be held accountable remains unclear, though sadly many of Judicial Watch’s own fans remain unconvinced it’ll ever happen because of the power she wields, and because of the power of the so-called “Deep State.”
Look:
Hillary is just like J Edgar Hoover. She has so much dirt on people in high places they will not touch her. If one of them squeals they wont be around long. Hillary is a wicked crooked evil Witch with many dead bodies behind her. This is a fact.
— robert m harman (@robertmharman1) February 11, 2019
To answer your question, I believe the answer is; NO, they won’t EVER do an honest investigation. So, we need to get to the bottom of the next question; WHY NOT?
— Lance Winslow (@winslow_lance) February 11, 2019
It just makes me angry. Why do ppl want to protect someone that did bad things to our Gov. The whole Clinton abuse of our Gov. was so wrong. Not to mention the horrible things they did to Trump. To shove it under the carpet just makes me sick
— Cheryl Mileff (@CMileff) February 12, 2019
No. Criminals don’t investigate criminals for fear their crimes will be exposed.
— R.V.Lawson? (@RVLawson_Author) February 12, 2019
The laws don’t apply to them.
— Who is John Galt? ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@Dagny_Galt) February 12, 2019
No. The @TheJusticeDept will never do an investigation of any of the corruption by Democrats in the lead up to the 2016 election or any other time. Only conservatives get investigated. Lady justice lost her blindfold and we officially have a 2 tier justice system
— Sense Gone Wild (@centsgonewild) February 11, 2019
To answer your question, I believe the answer is; NO, they won’t EVER do an honest investigation. So, we need to get to the bottom of the next question; WHY NOT?
— Lance Winslow (@winslow_lance) February 11, 2019
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Lawmakers from both parties look to Mayorkas to explain Russian cyberattacks on US water systems - April 24, 2024
- INSIDER: Biden reportedly mulling ‘desperate’ exec order that could impact more than 1 million criminal aliens - April 24, 2024
- House Sgt. at Arms threatens GOP Rep to delete video of Dems waving Ukraine flags or else - April 24, 2024
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!