Funny how the liberal media lost all interest in infamous “race faker” Rachel Dolezal after she was busted for welfare fraud. Allegedly.
Dolezal, who changed her name to Nkechi Diallo after her parents exposed her claim of being African-American as fraudulent, has a new trial date in her case.
A judge set a date of March 4 for Dolezal, the former president of an NAACP chapter in Washington state, to face charges of welfare fraud, perjury and false verification for public assistance, according to Fox News.
In a show of how far she took the ruse, Dolezal, 41, taught African studies at nearby Eastern Washington University — she lost that gig too when exposed for faking her race.
After claiming she was living off only a few hundred dollars, given to her by friends, Dolezal received nearly $9,000 in food assistance.
An investigation of her banking records during this time period showed that Dolezal deposited more than $80,000.
Just as her parents ratted her out for faking her race, it appears someone tipped off the state of Washington that Dolezal had received money from sales of her memoir, titled “In Full Color,” which was released after all the controversy over her race, Fox News reported.
In Full Color: Finding My Place In A #BlackandWhite World by Rachel Doležal with Storms Reback(2017). #Race #Black #Identity pic.twitter.com/tJwlJLV7ez
— UW PNW Curator (@pnwcurator) October 17, 2017
Court papers also showed that she made money from speaking engagements, soap making, doll making and the sale of her art.
As conservative actor James Woods noted, the whole saga has evolved into “a sad story finally.”
This is a sad story finally. https://t.co/i6mkFovrPe
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) January 5, 2019
Here’s a sampling of other responses from Twitter,
Although, as a social media user opined, reserve your judgment as the facts in the case “are not black and white.”
Reserve you judgement, the facts in the case are not black and white
— Kenny Onions (@Kenny_Onions) January 5, 2019
Here’s a sampling of other responses from Twitter:
If she were a Senator she wouldn’t be facing any legal consequences.
— Tarotgal8205 (@Tarotgal8205) January 5, 2019
Once a grifter, always a grifter.
— Guillory Creative (@guill_creative) January 5, 2019
Not at all. There’s consequences for one’s actions.
— Jamie Johnson (@JamieRobert0511) January 5, 2019
— Todd Sloan (@BoobmanDD) January 5, 2019
I’m surprised she didn’t hire #creepypornlawyer
— Forever grateful??? (@gratefullife20) January 6, 2019
She had such great hair tho
— Mrs. Don Johnson (@Emptydata) January 5, 2019
I’d be sad for her except that part about $9000 a month in Public Assistance for like 2 years. ?
— Melodie Willis Golde (@waterspryt) January 5, 2019
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Study reveals the mind-blowing cost of illegal immigration. Taxpayers buckle up! - March 8, 2023
- Jon Stewart unleashes vulgar rant on Fox News, conservatives over private communications - March 8, 2023
- Loomer launches Twitter attack on ‘Jill DeSantis’: ‘Pretending to be the Kennedys’ - March 8, 2023
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.