Elizabeth Warren’s DNA results cause confusion. How Trump responded to calls for him to pony up …


After years of questions about her ancestry, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., found a Stanford professor who produced a DNA test that showed “strong evidence” Warren had Native American blood in her family tree.

But like most things when it comes to the liberal zealot, her big “disclosure” Monday raised more questions for Warren than it provided clarity — beginning with a major math problem.

Stanford University professor Carlos D. Bustamante determined in his analysis that there is “strong evidence’’ Warren had a Native American in her family “in the range of 6-10 generations ago,” the Boston Globe reported.

Bustamante, considered an expert in the field, found the “vast majority” of Warren’s ancestry is European, but “results strongly support the existence of an unadmixed Native American ancestor.”

But as the paper noted that the “imprecision” of the analysis leaves a wide range of possibilities based on whether Warren’s great-great-great-grandmother, O.C. Sarah Smigh, who is at the center of her claim, hid Native American connections to avoid discrimination.

“Smith was born in the late 1700s. She identified as white in historical documents, though at the time Indians faced discrimination, and Smith would have had strong incentives to call herself white if possible.

“The inherent imprecision of the six-page DNA analysis could provide fodder for Warren’s critics. If her great-great-great-grandmother was Native American, that puts her at 1/32nd American Indian. But the report includes the possibility that she’s just 1/1024th Native American if the ancestor is 10 generations back.”


Saagar Enjeti, the White House correspondent for The Daily Caller tweeted a math error noted by The Globe that took suspect numbers from 1/512th Native American to 1/1024.


But that didn’t stop  Warren from taking to Twitter to tout that “a famous geneticist analyzed my DNA and concluded that it contains Native American ancestry,” along with a 5-plus minute video that could serve as a presidential campaign launch.

President Trump is called out in the video for mocking her alleged Native American heritage, with clips of him calling her “Pocahontas” being featured.

The president said during a campaign rally in Montana over the summer that he’d challenge her to use one of those DNA kits they “sell on television for $2” IF Warren brought up her heritage during a debate.

“I will give you $1 million to your favorite charity, paid for by Trump, if you take the test and it shows you’re an Indian,” he told the crowd he would tell Warren. “I have a feeling she will say no.”

Proclaiming victory, Warren called on Trump to follow through with his pledge — but she may have wanted to wait on that.

Presidnet Trump responded to the DNA results to say, “Who cares?”

He also stated that he did not pledge to donate 1 million dollars to charity if she could prove her ancestry.

“I didn’t say that, you better read it again,” Trump told reporters — which rings true, given that he made the suggestion while stating a hypothetical.

Conservative pundit Michelle Malkin responded with her own suggestion to how Trump should respond.

One thing seems certain, Warren is “100% running” against Trump in 2020, according to former Obama adviser David Axelrod.

However, as Axelrod noted, Monday’s disclosure “elevates” the “Pocahontas crap.”

Twitter was sure was lit on the subject matter, with the ridicule flowing freely:




Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Tom Tillison


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles