Kevin Daley, DCNF
GOP Sen. Susan Collins on Maine, a pro-choice moderate who holds a decisive vote on judicial confirmations, met privately Tuesday with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Collins said she had a wide-ranging discussion with Kavanaugh in which abortion featured prominently.
“We talked about whether he considered Roe to be settled law,” Collins said. “He said he agreed with what Chief Justice Roberts said at his nomination hearing, in which he said that it was settled law.”
“We had a very good, thorough discussion,” she added.
In that connection, Collins told reporters that she asked Kavanaugh about his dissent in a 2017 case called Azar v. Garza, in which the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ordered the Trump administration to provide abortion access for an undocumented minor in federal custody.
Kavanaugh initially joined the order of a three-judge panel giving the government several days to find a guardian who would procure an abortion for the unnamed minor — but the full D.C. Circuit reversed that decision over Kavanaugh’s dissent.
“Today’s majority decision…is ultimately based on a constitutional principle as novel as it is wrong: a new right for unlawful immigrant minors in U.S. government detention to obtain immediate abortion on demand,” he wrote.
The Supreme Court later nullified the decision, since the case was mooted prior to their review.
That Kavanaugh would call Roe “settled law” is fairly unremarkable. Supreme Court nominees tend to acknowledge Roe’s staying power as a matter of course. Justice Neil Gorsuch acknowledged that Roe is a valid precedent repeatedly affirmed by the high court during his confirmation hearing in March 2017.
What’s more, Supreme Court commentators have noted that the Supreme Court’s conservative majority is unlikely to mount a direct attack on Roe, preferring instead to neuter the ruling by chipping away at it over time.
Collins noted that she has not yet decided whether to support Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
“I have always waited until after the Judiciary Committee hearings before rendering a final decision on a Supreme Court nominee,” she said. “You never know what questions are going to come up.”
For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]
Latest posts by BPR Wire (see all)
- Hillary Clinton takes weak shot at Trump based on vague new reports claiming Russian election interference - February 21, 2020
- Trump tosses his support behind another effort to take out one of Silicon Valley’s biggest fish - February 21, 2020
- Pregnant illegal immigrant gives birth ‘approximately 30 minutes’ after crossing border - February 21, 2020