The anti-Trump media is desperate to expose President Donald Trump in anything that may lead to his impeachment, but the left-wing New Yorker Magazine literally exposed the president in an upcoming cover.
The cover, titled “Exposed,” features an illustration of a buck naked Trump standing at a White House podium, which conveniently obscures his private parts.
And as hard as we try, no images of a stark naked President Barack Obama come to mind. Or any other former president, for that matter — there were a few risqué covers of President Bill Clinton during the Monica Lewinski scandal, but not to this extent.
But then, when it comes to denigrating this president, the #FakeNews media knows no bounds in its obsession to destroy him.
“I wanted to address President Trump’s stormy relationship with the press,” said the artist behind the image, Barry Blitt, playing on the claim by porn star Stormy Daniels of an alleged affair with Trump.
The naked image of Trump “recalls the prophet Bob Dylan, who once noted, in ‘It’s Alright Ma (I’m Only Bleeding),’ that ‘even the President of the United States must sometimes have to stand naked,'” the magazine explained.
And while the hate-filled left reveled over the obscene cover, rational minded people were repulsed. Rightfully so.
Here’s a sampling of responses from respectful Americans, as seen on Twitter:
If the President were a woman, would the New Yorker body-shame her on the cover of their magazine? If not, will the New Yorker admit to being sexist bigots?
— Nicky Zwan (@nicky_zwan) March 17, 2018
Shameful. The media l has lost all sense of decorum.
Imagine if The New Yorker plastered a naked Obama on its cover. This level of disrespect should disturb all people, no matter the party affiliation.#SpecialReport #Tucker #TheStory #Dobbs pic.twitter.com/v2RAZMGWDB
— Tosca Austen (@ToscaAusten) March 16, 2018
Seems the @NewYorker has fallen deep into the pits of liberal hell with this cover. I just canceled my subscription. Feels great. #MSMscum #BoycottTheNewYorker – @foxandfriends https://t.co/h7asRbOert @FoxNews
— Vicky ☆F🌸R☆ Trump (@Vicky4Trump) March 16, 2018
I am trying to find the words to articulate how sick and offensive the March 26th, 2018 cover of The New Yorker is but I doubt these anti-American militants would see how sick and offensive they are. I am not posting the picture because I don’t want to give them any attention.
— Phillip C Parrish (@phillipcparrish) March 17, 2018
Imagine if someone did this to Obama. https://t.co/aS7im9nRml
— Rep. Steven Smith 🇺🇸 (@RepStevenSmith) March 16, 2018
Lets imagine a Hillary presidency and some Republican mouthpiece using her caricature this way. https://t.co/tTON3GlXEs
— Vineet Bhuwania (@vineetbhuwania) March 17, 2018
You would think a liberal magazine wouldn't try to body shame someone.
Hypocrisy at its finest. https://t.co/v4ltIx6c1Z
— RiverOwl83❌ #WWG1WGA (@RiverOwl83) March 17, 2018
This is what Libtard Media do to Trump and when he hits back, cry and moan about freedom blah blah. https://t.co/PxPys4K0Ep
— 🕉 𝔻𝕖𝕖𝕡𝕒𝕜 (@KodelaDeepak) March 17, 2018
If this was Hillary the MSM would lose their minds. This shows you that liberal MSM act like they denounce sexual harassment and child molestation but it's a cover for what they mentally desire. They post partial nudity for all ages to see. It's sick!! https://t.co/SMDgm8iAxU
— Gil (@therealgilp) March 17, 2018
Latest posts by Tom Tillison (see all)
- ‘It’s Lieutenant Colonel’: ‘Revealing’ moment Vindman ‘corrects’ Nunes for not addressing him by rank - November 19, 2019
- Jordan methodically narrows possibilities of who may have tipped whistleblower during Vindman grilling - November 19, 2019
- ‘Answer or plead the Fifth’: Nunes appears to hit the mark when he grills Vindman over ‘whistleblower’ - November 19, 2019