Congressman with cash in his freezer released from prison because the bar for corruption is higher now

DCNFBy Jack Crowe, DCNF

Former Louisiana Rep. William Jefferson was released from prison after serving less than half of his 13-year sentence, due to a Supreme Court ruling that increased the prosecutorial threshold for corruption charges.

Image: screenshot AP

U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III re-sentenced Jefferson, a former Democratic lawmaker, to time served Friday morning after vacating Jefferson’s last remaining conviction, according to The Washington Post. Ellis first sentenced Jefferson in 2009 on corruption charges, but was compelled to reduce the 13-year sentence due to the high court’s reinterpretation of what behavior constitutes public corruption.

The Supreme Court case concerning Republican Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell led to the redefinition of what behavior on the part of an elected official constitutes an “official act,” narrowing the scope of potentially prosecutable behavior.

The conviction on 16 charges stemmed from Jefferson’s involvement in African business dealings, which at one point compelled him to hide $90,000 in his freezer on behalf of the president of Nigeria.

Jefferson’s attorney reached an agreement earlier this week in which the government will retain the $189,000 seized from Jefferson and will not press further charges.

“Public corruption is a cancer on this country and it needs to be revealed, prosecuted and punished,” the judge said. “I think it now has been.”

He added that the decision should not be interpreted as an endorsement of Jefferson’s conduct, which he referred to as “venal.”

Jefferson, who was released from prison on October but was only taken off court monitoring Friday, will now serve one year of supervised release.

“I’m going to go back home and have a Christmas dinner with my family,” Jefferson told WaPo outside an Alexandria courthouse. “Whatever they want me to cook.”

The former lawmaker said there’s “no point in talking about that now” when asked if he believes he acted improperly.

The definition of a “official act” laid out in the McDonnell case also played a role in the recent mistrial in the corruption case against New Jersey Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez.

Follow Jack on Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.


PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles