In light of the endless hysteria surrounding supposed Russian hacking of DNC servers and Democratic insistence that the Trump campaign was somehow involved, author and investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson has a pointed question … or two.
Upon discovering the alleged interference, why on earth wouldn’t the DNC have turned their compromised servers over to the FBI post-haste?
After all, wasn’t national security at stake?
“If Democratic National Committee DNC had turned its server(s) over for FBI exam after alleged Russia hacking of emails, I wonder what would have been found,” Attkisson tweeted. “Why didn’t FBI didn’t just take servers if national security were at stake? Permission not needed for matters so important.”
https://twitter.com/SharylAttkisson/status/924370964405768194
What’s worse, according to the FBI, the DNC actually “inhibited” the investigation.
LATEST: FBI says they asked DNC for servers, and DNC refused, "inhibited" the investigation. pic.twitter.com/AfkAPlJsYZ
— Ali Watkins (@AliWatkins) January 5, 2017
Why would the good, well-meaning, law-abiding folks at the DNC have wanted to “inhibit” an FBI investigation into the supposed hacking of their servers? Could it possibly be that they had something to hide?
And further still, why wouldn’t the FBI have just insisted on access?
Perhaps James Comey should come before Congress for a whole other line of questioning.
Attkisson’s question prompted plenty of Twitter buzz from similar inquiring minds.
https://twitter.com/Rxp70018232/status/924825364068671489
https://twitter.com/ybhjchr8809/status/924791246249431046
https://twitter.com/BrianHartness1/status/924791492471861250
RT…
CUZZZZZZ… FBI was in on the COVER-UP !? https://t.co/30EJDsKk2B
— 🇺🇸 Patti Benni 🇺🇸 (@pattibenni1) October 30, 2017
Things that make you go hmmmm https://t.co/X4OYHLWdLa
— 🇺🇸 Fat Popm 🇺🇸 (@FatPopm) October 30, 2017
as so much in this investigation,because the FBI didn't investigate properly, we will never know. Crimes being committed in plain sight #FBI https://t.co/5wUzAu7tuM
— Justhinkaboutit (@XxTimSmoothxX) October 29, 2017
https://twitter.com/guidoredneck/status/924635925128400906
https://twitter.com/MerlinNewtonSr/status/924454392937439232
https://twitter.com/CriticalMessUS/status/924748534745849857
https://twitter.com/LFS1776/status/924642881284882433
And finally, we’re not excusing any potential Manifort wrongdoing here, but this lady does ask a great question:
It's amazing that FBI stormed Paul Manafort's house to confiscate his computer but didn't storm the DNC to get theirs…corrupt hypocrites https://t.co/4uR3v2xrfe
— Lamb2u (@StLarise) October 29, 2017
Wake up right! Receive our free morning news blast HERE
Op-ed views and opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of BizPac Review.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- West Point accepts Parkland student’s application to military academy after his tragic death - February 21, 2018
- Nancy Pelosi is in middle of grandstanding at Arizona townhall when question yelled from audience grinds it to a halt - February 21, 2018
- Columbine survivor blows media’s plan to exploit naive students – here’s what happens when they grow up - February 20, 2018
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!