In light of the endless hysteria surrounding supposed Russian hacking of DNC servers and Democratic insistence that the Trump campaign was somehow involved, author and investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson has a pointed question … or two.
Upon discovering the alleged interference, why on earth wouldn’t the DNC have turned their compromised servers over to the FBI post-haste?
After all, wasn’t national security at stake?
“If Democratic National Committee DNC had turned its server(s) over for FBI exam after alleged Russia hacking of emails, I wonder what would have been found,” Attkisson tweeted. “Why didn’t FBI didn’t just take servers if national security were at stake? Permission not needed for matters so important.”
If Democratic National Committee DNC had turned its server(s) over for FBI exam after alleged Russia hacking of emails, I wonder what would have been found. Why didn't FBI didn't just take servers if national security were at stake? Permission not needed for matters so important.
— Sharyl Attkisson🕵️♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) October 28, 2017
What’s worse, according to the FBI, the DNC actually “inhibited” the investigation.
LATEST: FBI says they asked DNC for servers, and DNC refused, "inhibited" the investigation. pic.twitter.com/AfkAPlJsYZ
— Ali Watkins (@AliWatkins) January 5, 2017
Why would the good, well-meaning, law-abiding folks at the DNC have wanted to “inhibit” an FBI investigation into the supposed hacking of their servers? Could it possibly be that they had something to hide?
And further still, why wouldn’t the FBI have just insisted on access?
Perhaps James Comey should come before Congress for a whole other line of questioning.
Attkisson’s question prompted plenty of Twitter buzz from similar inquiring minds.
Yes, who else has ever gotten away with telling the FBI no thanks, "nothing to see here, these aren't the drones we're looking for"? https://t.co/NZNvsL9gNA
— RXP460 (@Rxp70018232) October 30, 2017
Agree. FBI losing more credibility w/ every excuse. If U really wanted 2 examine the servers, U would have whether Dems agreed or not. https://t.co/TqL3PHepsp
— BamaCovfefeAlee (@CovfefeAlee) October 30, 2017
They don't mind taking anybody else's so why did they just ASK for the DNC's https://t.co/vTVv3mfZUW
— ❌ Pray Harder ❌ (@BrianHartness1) October 30, 2017
CUZZZZZZ… FBI was in on the COVER-UP !? https://t.co/30EJDsKk2B
— Patti Benni 🇺🇸 (@pattibenni1) October 30, 2017
Things that make you go hmmmm https://t.co/X4OYHLWdLa
— AXSOM 🇺🇸 (@jwaxsom) October 30, 2017
— Justhinkaboutit (@XxTimSmoothxX) October 29, 2017
FBI and DOJ were in the tank for the Democrats. https://t.co/hj3nVZnbi5
— MerlinNewtonSr (@MerlinNewtonSr) October 29, 2017
because the top of the FBI, CIA et al and the DNC are colluding against American citizens in EVERY conceivable way. https://t.co/sNKgd2QkaV
— RYAN TYLER (@LFS1776) October 29, 2017
And finally, we’re not excusing any potential Manifort wrongdoing here, but this lady does ask a great question:
It's amazing that FBI stormed Paul Manafort's house to confiscate his computer but didn't storm the DNC to get theirs…corrupt hypocrites https://t.co/4uR3v2xrfe
— larise St john ❌ (@StLarise) October 29, 2017
Wake up right! Receive our free morning news blast HERE
Op-ed views and opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of BizPac Review.
Latest posts by Scott Morefield (see all)
- West Point accepts Parkland student’s application to military academy after his tragic death - February 21, 2018
- Nancy Pelosi is in middle of grandstanding at Arizona townhall when question yelled from audience grinds it to a halt - February 21, 2018
- Columbine survivor blows media’s plan to exploit naive students – here’s what happens when they grow up - February 20, 2018