Pro-sharia activist Linda Sarsour knew exactly what she was doing when she declared “jihad” against President Trump and urged Muslims to resist assimilation.
That’s what Fox News commentator Laura Ingraham and a growing chorus of Muslims and Islamic scholars said in response to leftists claiming Sarsour did not mean “jihad” when she said “jihad.”
The brouhaha erupted after Sarsour invoked Allah and declared jihad on President Trump, whom she slandered as a white supremacist and an Islamophobe. The anti-Semitic activist made the comments while speaking at the annual Islamic Society of North America convention in Chicago.
“When we stand up to those who oppress our communities, Allah accepts that from us as a form of jihad,” Sarsour said.
“As the Muslim community in these United States of America, we have to stay perpetually outraged! Our No. 1 priority is to protect our community. It is not to assimilate.”
Pro-Islam apologists for sharia like Imam Mohammad Ali Elahi immediately leapt to Sarsour’s defense. “‘Jihad’ means to be a better person, more honest, more truthful, more trustworthy,” Elahi said. “But, of course, if you you live this jihad for ISIS … they have a different interpretation of it.”
But most people understood exactly why she used the violent rhetoric. It was a call to action to fringe, violent Muslims who embrace Sharia and want to destroy Western civilization.
“She’s a sophisticated player,” Ingraham told Fox News. “That was meant to incite Muslims to whom she’s speaking.”
Ingraham added that calling President Trump a “fascist, Islamophobe, white supremacist” is “purposefully incendiary.”
Lebanese-American terrorism expert Brigitte Gabriel agreed. “She was specifically inciting hatred and violence,” Gabriel said.
Gabriel, the founder of Act for America, unleashed a Twitter storm condemning Linda Sarsour (who once threatened her) for her violent anti-Semitic, anti-American rhetoric.
It’s happening in India, too. pic.twitter.com/bGgbP4zkf9
— Natasha (@natashachauhan) July 7, 2017
— Dave Rubin (@RubinReport) July 7, 2017
“Why don’t liberals listen we tell them we know exactly what Sarsour meant?”
Why don't liberals listen when we tell them we know exactly what Sarsour meant when she waged "jihad" against Trump?
She played herself. pic.twitter.com/fBd1jzyV1y
— RAM (Richard Armande Mills) (@RAMRANTS) July 9, 2017
— Creeping Sharia (@creepingsharia) July 7, 2017
— 𝕔hi𝓁𝓁iຖ໐iˢ (@chiIIum) July 7, 2017
— ✝️🇺🇸#ToxicMasculinity (@toxMasQulinity) July 6, 2017
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- DOJ attorney in charge of election-crimes unit quits after AG Barr opens investigation - November 10, 2020
- ‘Whoa, whoa, whoa’: Neil Cavuto slammed after he cuts off Kayleigh McEnany presser - November 10, 2020
- Same media that cheered Stacey Abrams, Al Gore for refusing to concede attack Trump for same move - November 8, 2020
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.