Leave it to CNN to find the dumbest possible way to report on the terrorist attack in London.
While multiple attacks unfolded on Saturday night the headline on CNN television read “Stabbing Rampage, Van Attack In London.”
As if a rogue van got loose and started attacking people.
There is hardly a doubt that if the terrorists used guns, CNN and other liberals would have been screaming about gun control.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone, coming from a network that employs a man who used the terror attacks to call the President of the United States a “piece of sh*t” and “an embarrassment to humankind.”
President Donald Trump put it in perspective on Sunday when he noted that “we are not having a gun debate right now” because it didn’t fit the liberal narrative.
Do you notice we are not having a gun debate right now? That’s because they used knives and a truck!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 4, 2017
But neither does saying “radical Islamic terrorism.”
Which is why CNN, and other mainstream media outlets, put the blame on a van.
Terror in London: Police declare two terrorist incidents, including van attack on London Bridge https://t.co/9n02LTqrdB pic.twitter.com/arzjBKqDIv
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) June 4, 2017
London van attack is being investigated as “potential act of terror” https://t.co/rEdRKpRYIY pic.twitter.com/NqD7uEvzlN
— VICE News (@vicenews) June 4, 2017
And why social media, led by adult film star Jenna Jameson, smashed them for it.
Seriously @CNN A VAN attack?????? A fucking VAN attack? Plz delete your channel ?? https://t.co/ns32IhgiLB
— Jenna Jameson (@jennajameson) June 4, 2017
Hey CNN, Can You Change The Headline To “Terrorist Attack” Instead of “Van Attack”#LondonBridge #London #Trump pic.twitter.com/nBWpv6CVUg
— Immigrants☆4☆Trump (@immigrant4trump) June 4, 2017
A VAN ATTACK!!!
“Van’s” do not attack people. Terrorist attack people stupid #CNN#LondonBridge #London pic.twitter.com/ylvfiPRfCe— Pamela Moore (@Pamela_Moore13) June 4, 2017
A VAN ATTACK!!!!
Are you insane @CNN?!!!#London pic.twitter.com/hRPHkHcncN
— The Columbia Bugle (@ColumbiaBugle) June 4, 2017
VAN ATTACK?! More like Radical Islam attack
Has anyone ever seen a van with no driver run over innocent people?
CNN is ISIS#LondonBridge pic.twitter.com/E3le0CUX2t
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 4, 2017
So #fakenews CNN called it a “van attack” huh?
Yep, a van just took it upon itself to attack pedestrians on a sidewalk.
Uh-huh? https://t.co/iPUHWP7IwL
— Mensans for Trump (@Mensans4Trump) June 4, 2017
CNN: Van Attack In London
Apparently, it was one of Google’s new driverless vehicles, CNN hasn’t mentioned the TERRORIST that were driving.— B F D (@bfd1dreyer) June 4, 2017
I’ve never seen a van attack anyone before…must be like guns. Ban all vans!
— 994ooןɐq (@baloo499) June 4, 2017
Wake up right! Receive our free morning news blast HERE
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Britney Spears shows off her rockin’ new bod, but had to spoil it with a liberal message about ‘Dreamers’ - December 24, 2017
- Border patrol forget they’re supposed to be heartless, deliver beautiful baby at the border - December 24, 2017
- After scoring tax cut victory, Trump sees ‘tremendous Democrat support’ for his next big initiative - December 24, 2017
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!