Oops! New York Times forced to issue an embarrassing correction; it forgot about its own BS

[sharenow]

The New York Times was obligated to issue an embarrassing correction of its own history on the Electoral College.

Bill O’Reilly: The Left wants white power taken away from establishment for a profound change in America

After labeling the “antiquated mechanism” a “living symbol of America’s original sin” in a Dec. 19 editorial calling for the end of the Electoral College system, the publication made a discovery.

Not only did the editors forget that they used to be in favor of the Electoral College, they buried the memory of the 2000 election when a different Republican president won enough electoral votes while losing the popular vote.

The Times issued this red-faced correction the next day:

Correction: December 20, 2016
An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that the editorial board has been opposed to the Electoral College going back 80 years. It failed to note an exception: in 2000, the board defended the college after the election of George W. Bush.

A few elections ago, the editorial board at the Times had issued “The Case for the Electoral College,” arguing that it was “first and foremost a compact among states, large and small, designed to ensure that one state or one region did not dominate the others.”

Bill Clinton’s ‘angry white male’ slander drew plenty of fire, but Ann Coulter’s response won the internet

The editorial defended the many “benefits” of the system and concluded:

“The system has survived earlier instances in which the winner of the popular vote was denied the presidency. Wise voters and legislators will want to make sure that it survives this one as well.”

Seems the Times forgot their own advice.

Wake up right! Receive our free morning news blast HERE

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
[sharenow]
Frieda Powers

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles