Why did the Obama administration humiliate Loretta Lynch?

With the FBI’s senselessly PC decision to put out a transcript of Omar Mateen’s 911 call with all references to Allah, ISIS, and Islam removed, one is driven to ask why did Obama send U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch out there to look like a fool with such an absurd release?

Even the New York Post noticed how odd it was that Obama’s Attorney General Lynch seemed to have been sent out like a strange sacrificial lamb on the whole mess.

Yesterday the entire media landscape was abuzz with the heavily redacted 911 transcript where the Obama administration took out all words that proved Orlando gay nightclub terrorist Omar Mateen was perpetrating his crime in the name of Islam.

Immediately the FBI and Obama became an object of ridicule over the redactions and by the end of the business day another transcript was quietly released that contained everything Mateen said on the call.

Here is an example of what the redactions looked like on the first “official” FBI transcript:

Mateen: I pledge of allegiance to [omitted]….I pledge allegiance to [omitted] may God protect him [in Arabic], on behalf of [omitted].

Is it any wonder Obama’s regime was slammed for putting out such an absurd document?

But as the Daily News reminded its readers, Obama sent Loretta Lynch out there to proclaim what a great idea the redacted transcript was making her look like a fool when the full transcript was released under pressure of abject ridicule only a few hours later.

The paper also reminded readers that Obama sent out then-UN Ambassador Susan Rice out to all the Sunday morning political shows to insist that the Benghazi terror attack was a result of an “anti-Islamic video” when it never was. Rice was made to look the fool then, too.

It all made the paper ask, “It makes you wonder: Who at the White House feels compelled to send women of color out to humiliate themselves on national TV?”

Comments

Latest Articles