Trump has liberal media gasping over story of dipping bullets in pigs blood to kill Muslim terrorists

The left has had a field day after Donald Trump riled up a crowd in South Carolina on Friday by regaling them with a story of how an American general dealt with terrorists by dipping bullets in pig’s blood before killing them.

Trump told the crowd the legend of Gen. John J. Pershing who, the story says, had a Muslim terrorism problem in the Philippines in 1911 and to teach them a lesson gathered 50 terrorists and killed 49 of them with bullets dipped in pig’s blood.

The 50th man was let go to tell the others what happened and America didn’t see another terrorism problem for 25 years, according to the legend.

To anyone who can reason, Trump was using the illustration to tell the crowd that America isn’t tough enough on terrorists and that he would be tougher.

“Can you imagine these people, when they sit around at night eating whatever they’re eating, and talking – and they’re talking about the United States that they’re actually worried about waterboarding as being a little bit cruel and these people chop off heads,” he told the crowd. “They must think we are the dumbest and the weakest and the stupidest people on earth, on earth — On Earth!”

Several news organizations missed the point entirely and jumped on the story stating unequivocally that Trump had shared a false tale. Some cited Snopes as their source.

But Snopes did not call the story false at all.

Snopes described the story as a legend which they could not prove or disprove.

“We haven’t eliminated the possibility that Pershing at some point chose to deal with a group of “Mohammedan fanatics” in a manner similar to the one described (in the story),” the website wrote.

A far cry from calling the story false.

The technique is one that politicians often pull out, but the left only freaks out like this when it’s a Trump story about killing presumed Muslim terrorists.

Hillary Clinton still hasn’t explained the illustrative tale she told the Des Moine Register early January, according to Fox News. Weeks later she retold the tale but this time she said a person she met on the campaign trail gave her that example the day before.

The New York Daily News took the opportunity to make a fool of itself again with another ridiculous cover.

Slate tried to say Trump endorsed executing Muslims in the same manner.

Here’s a beauty from MSNBC.

Watch his speech below and decide for yourself what Trump was actually saying.

[wpvideo lgwvN0Ma]

We know first-hand that censorship against conservative news is real. Please share stories and encourage your friends to sign up for our daily email blast so they are not getting shut out of seeing conservative news.

Carmine Sabia

Carmine Sabia

Carmine Sabia Jr started his own professional wrestling business at age 18 and went on to become a real estate investor. Currently he is a pundit who covers political news and current events.
Carmine Sabia


19 thoughts on “Trump has liberal media gasping over story of dipping bullets in pigs blood to kill Muslim terrorists

  1. Patriot1119 says:

    hopefully none of these dunces will ever read the biblical parables and become totally confused and bewildered…

  2. tsigili says:

    It is true, that terrorism is a big problem in the Philippines today. That is an indicator it has been a problem in the past as well, so the story could absolutely be true.

    1. BTeboe says:

      Islam is a problem wherever it goes. The reason is Islam. Islam does not assimilate into any other society. Islam is a govt unto itself and kills people who attempt to leave Islam or even READ a Bible or any other religious material that is not Islamic. It rules the masses through fear and intimidation and absolute control over the individual throughout the entire day and night. It is miserable and hate filled with the female half of their society treated as property. No more, no less. Sharia is law that they use to enforce their govt and it is a govt based on a 7th century sociopathic thug’s ideas. It is brutal with no space for affection. Muslim is the religion and the religion gives you the rules for living under Islam. What you can eat and when, when you must pray, when you must fast, and so on and so on and the ideology is reinforced with the Koran. The Koran is nothing more than a field manual on ‘how to conquer the world’ or global jihad.
      We don’t need these people here.

  3. Ray n MI says:

    I would have no problem with them doing whatever is necessary to eradicate Islamic terrorists from this planet. Even if it meant eradicating all of Islam.

  4. What_no_change??? says:

    Where I can’t say it’s a bad idea…Trump is just saying what he knows people in the area he is in WANT to hear. The fools in this country voted in the idiot we have in the WH NOW because he told them what they wanted to hear. People time to look closer. Look if you really believe what Trump is saying is real and true. Research it and start asking question like how is this going to get paid for? How exactly are you going to accomplish that? Then if that person (weather Trump or not) still is the best ten vote for them but be honest with yourself. After saying all that…I happen to believe after all the primary’s are in, if Trump or Cruz get the votes for the nomination the ESTABLISHMENT will find a way to wipe them off the slate and pick THEIR candidate. So while all this is entertaining, we have no chance of having Trump or Cruse as the Republican Candidate. If that happens I think BOTH of them should run as Pres. and VP team as independents (don’t know if they can legally but … it sounds good). They could win too! LOL

    1. tedlv says:

      The two party system is not mandated by law. Yes, they could, either or both, run as independents. That would guarantee a communist win.

      1. What_no_change??? says:

        Actually there is such a thing as a Sore Looser Law that in many states prohibits candidates who have lost a primary to then run as an independent.

        The question in legality here would be should one of them win the primary but the establishment then takes that win and abolishes it through their own political BS. The argument could be made that the will of the people is being circumvented by the establishment there by making this law null and void in this case…but then they would have to have it nullified in each state that the law exists.

        As far as a guarantee that a communist would win? I am not sure that is true. Especially if it were a Trump/Cruz ticket, and knowing the reason for the split was because of the establishment in DC could be enough to push the people supporting BOTH candidates to work to defeat the establishment as a whole flushing both Democrat and Republican down the hole. Because we have attempted as a people to push the establishment out of the Senate and the House only to hit the seemingly impenetrable RINO wall, and independent probably has the best possible opportunity to win in a presidential election.

        Secondly, if we are governed by ESTABLISHMENT do nothing Republicrats who do EVERYTHING the democrats want or democrats who do EVERYTHING the democrats want what is the difference? We are then settling for exactly what we are fighting AGAINST!

        Sore-loser law

        From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

        In United States politics, a sore-loser law is a law which states that the loser in a primary election can not then run as an independent in the general election.[1] In most states, these laws do not apply to presidential candidates. Many states accomplish the same requirement by having simultaneous registration dates for the primary and the general election; in fact only the states of Connecticut, Iowa, New York and Vermont have neither a sore-loser law nor simultaneous registration deadlines.[2]

    2. James Dixon says:

      You make a valid point but I still think Trump will do what he says he will do.We all make mistakes but to give up hope in everybody because of the actions of one idiot would be a far more damaging move,maybe even fatal for the country.

      1. What_no_change??? says:

        That’s the hurdle I can’t get over with Trump…What makes you so sure that he can do what he says he will do? Think of it this way…lets say to get done what he wants to get done he has to circumvent congress through executive action. I that now OK? Trump (and Cruze probably even more so) are going to have a huge problem with the republican establishment fighting them constantly. Most of what Trump is saying I like (again why he is saying it) but just like asking ain’t getting, saying ain’t doing.

    3. MississippiJane says:

      Trump has been saying, since 1984, that we will get foreign nations to pay for our services. And I believe he will do just that. He has said for all these years that countries like Japan and Kuwait that are wealthy should pay for our bailing them out. But our leaders keep giving them our tax payers’ money and taking nothing in return. If you want to see this for yourself, google Trump interviews from 1988 and from 25 years ago. I have watched three, and they are informative and amazing in their consistency with what he is saying today. He says that Mexico will pay for the wall. I don’t think he would bill Mexico, but I do think he would withhold foreign aid from that country and perhaps that would pay for the wall. And I think he has other ways in mind, as well.

      1. BTeboe says:

        Yeah, as a nation, we really can’t afford to be ‘giving’ money to any other country. $20 Trillion in debt.

  5. Fastercat says:

    I’ve been saying for years to bury the dead ones with pig entrails.

  6. ooddballz says:

    Several news organizations missed the point entirely and jumped on the
    story stating unequivocally that Trump had shared a false tale. Some
    cited Snopes as their source,

    Snopes? People still use that?

  7. Tumbleweed says:

    Nothing wrong with coating your bullets with pig fat when dealing with Islamic terrotists!

    1. Mary Brown says:

      Fill the hollow points with pig crap then coat in pig fat! If it is just a wound the crap will cause blood poisoning!

  8. F6F_Hellcat says:

    So… Killing terrorists with bullets dipped in pig’s blood is a heretical offence to Liberals.. But ISIS mass murdering Christians, mass raping girls as young as they can, and the very real fact ISIS is sending insurgents overseas with “refugees” is not worthy of being on guard for.

    I suppose I will never understand how this is not a double standard of epic proportions.

  9. Mary Brown says:

    Common Core strikes again! Liberal morons who are to stupid to have read the real history of this country!

    1. AbbyRhodes says:

      Haha — “to stupid.” You could use some Common Core English instruction.

      1. Mary Brown says:

        to too who gives a rats ass! Go correct spelling on school papers.

Comments are closed.

Latest Articles