Political activist Pamela Geller was recently sued by a pair of Muslims currently serving time in a Michigan correctional facility — for wearing a polka-dot bikini.
Geller, who co-founded the American Freedom Defense Initiative in an effort to stop the Islamization of the United States, described the lawsuit as “paranoid, outrageous, silly and laughable,” in a post she wrote for Breitbart News.
Geller’s lawyer, David Yerushalmi of the American Freedom Law Center, told her that “They sued you because, inter alia, you wear a bikini to distract them.”
Most people would say that for being 57, or any age for that matter, she looks pretty good. Here’s a copy of the complaint:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGANRick Tocket Muhammad;
Wayde Albright,
PlaintiffsV.
Pamela Geller;
Michigan Department of Corrections,
DefendantsHabeas Corpus Relief
Under 28 USC 2241the matter in which our sentences are executed is unconstitutional. We are subjected to cruel and unusual Punishment under the 8th amendment Farmer v. Brennan
Pamela Geller hates Muslims. Pamela Geller serves Pork to Muslim Inmates. Pamela Geller writes Cartoons in our Koran. Pamela Geller Rhymes with Pen and teller Making Fun of our Beards and Ankle plants. Pamela Geller plans to Eat in Front of us During Ramadan. When we pray 5 days, Geller wears a Poke a Dot Bikini In Front of our eyes. We are offended. Pamela Geller is Anti Islamic She has Anti Islam tatted on her Naval Area and Islam with a Pig on her inner thigh. Pamela Geller Was Born in Mecca we are Denied Haj to Mecca our 5 pillars. We are scared Pamela Geller put a hit on us with the Aryan Brotherhood We seek Immediate release From prison. Our civil Rights are violated.
Respectfully
Rick Tocket Muhammad (signed) 6/7/15
Wayde Albright (signed) 6/6/15
But as rambling, disjointed and nonsensical as the complaint is, you haven’t seen anything yet. Here it is in it’s original form:
The court subsequently dismissed the complaint on its own — but not because it was a frivolous lawsuit or that it failed to state a cause of action.
“The court dismissed the complaint on its own because plaintiff(s) failed to file the requisite filing fee or file the correct form to have the fee waived,” Yerushalmi wrote Geller.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Act like a grownup’: Drunk driver sobs when she loses plea deal by coming 4 hours late to court - July 23, 2017
- ‘I would’ve fired her the day I met her’: Glenn Beck reveals more about Tomi Lahren mess - July 23, 2017
- Canadian thug beats 74-year-old cyclist bloody with a club in road rage fit– and they say US is more violent? - July 23, 2017
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
