Conservatives, Malkin skewer Priebus for pathetic pandering after throwing candidates to wolves

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus was quick to jump on the GOP anti-media steamroll immediately following CNBC’s biased-filled debate.

In a few tweets Priebus shocked political pundits and unleashed how he supposedly felt.

CNBC should be ashamed of how this debate was handled. #GOPDebate

— Reince Priebus (@Reince) October 29, 2015

I will fight to ensure future debates allow for a more robust exchange. #GOPDebate

— Reince Priebus (@Reince) October 29, 2015

Priebus told reporters that he thought “maybe” CNBC would have brought “forward a pretty fair forum” for the candidates and called the line of questioning “extremely disappointing.”

To be clear, the Republican panel put on a refreshing show of strength, confidence and solidity as they fought back against loaded and un-vetted questions.

It’s hard to know if the candidates and the audience hadn’t fought back with such force if Priebus would have been singing the same tune. After all, he has a lot to do with putting the debates together.

POLL: Which of the GOP candidates won CNBC’s Republican Primary Debate?

According to Drudge, the candidates were “thrown to the wolves.” Drudge linked to a Time article from last summer that stated:

RNC Chairman Reince Priebus announced a 13-member committee of Republican officials who will set rules for the GOP’s debates during the 2016 cycle, including selecting venues, debate partners, and even moderators. The committee will be led by Priebus ally Steve Duprey of New Hampshire, who was close to both Mitt Romney and John McCain. The committee is dominated by Priebus loyalists.

“Our debates will be good for our candidates and for voters—not a field day for the media,” Priebus told members of the RNC on Friday in Chicago, shortly before the party approved its final rules for the 2016 presidential nomination fight.

It would serve Republicans well if the RNC chairman the could find his passionate support of the candidates before, during, and not just after the debates.

Plenty on social media agree, including conservative columnist Michelle Malkin:

Little late for that, yo. RT @Reince: I will fight to ensure future debates allow for a more robust exchange. #GOPDebate — Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) October 29, 2015

@Reince @irritatedwoman oh go sell your BS to @TheDemocrats they buy tons and tons of it!!! #txot — Katy (@KatyinIndy) October 29, 2015

@Reince U haven’t done anything so far. The candidates did it themselves tonight. U should have stopped that crap during the 1st on w Fox

— Nancy M (@mcnancee) October 29, 2015

@Reince ya, great now that most of the debates are over! You’re all talk!

— Sheri (@1MedicMom) October 29, 2015

@R_Alan_Forbes I hope @Reince takes some responsibility for tonight’s debacle instead of feigning rage at CNBC. Waiting…. — Karie Ponder (@Karlynpon) October 29, 2015

@Reince you can help by resigning. Tonight. — Mark Sawyer (@CarlSpakler2) October 29, 2015

Voters are waiting.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!