Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton‘s long awaited appearance before the House Select Committee on Benghazi finally arrived Thursday, and one of the more hard-hitting lines of questioning came from Rep. Lynn Westmoreland regarding why requests for more security were ignored.
The Republican from Georgia noted that Stevens had sent about twenty requests for additional security, and asked why he didn’t contact Clinton directly since the two were friends.
“I do not believe that he had my personal email,” Clinton replied. “He had the email and the direct line to everybody that he worked with for years.”
“If I were a friend of yours, I would have found a way to reach you,” Westmoreland said.
Clinton did acknowledge that there were requests for more security.
“Yes, he and the people working for him asked for more security, some of those requests were approved, others were not,” she said nonchalantly. “We’re obviously looking to learn what more we could do.”
Clinton then all but placed the blame for his ultimate demise on Ambassador Stevens himself.
“He never said to anyone in the State Department, ‘You know what, we just can’t keep doing this, we can’t stay there,’” she said.
.@HillaryClinton: Some requests for more security were approved; others were not https://t.co/Yz04hma85H https://t.co/sPYPginZn2
— CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) October 22, 2015
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Trump accused of ‘sexist attack’ for ripping Jessica Tarlov’s ‘grating and unendurable’ voice - January 27, 2023
- Rep Rogers, a former special agent, warns FBI ‘in crisis’ and will be destroyed if Biden won’t fix it NOW - January 27, 2023
- Obama signs off on Klain’s official departure, Biden taps controversial new chief-of-staff - January 27, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.