Krauthammer: Clinton ‘moral corruption’ is big, and it’s bad, ‘but there’s one big problem’

Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer offered a realistic and worrisome perspective about the Clinton Foundation scandal on Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor” Wednesday.

“The Clintons are clever. They cover their tracks,” Krauthammer told host Bill O’Reilly.

The two were discussing the highly anticipated and already controversial book titled, “Clinton Cash.” In it, author Peter Schweizer alleges Clinton amassed huge sums of money from foreign governments in exchange for special favors during her tenure as secretary of state.

O’Reilly says the amount of money collected is “staggering.” From 2001 to 2014, O’Reilly reported the Clinton Foundation took in about $2 billion.

“According to public records, [The Clinton Foundation] spends about 88 percent of that on projects to improve peoples’ lives,” O’Reilly said.

The remaining part of $2 billion dollars – which is substantial to say the least – is apparently left for various expenditures.

“From 2002 to 2013, the Clinton Foundation spent about $70 million in travel expenses alone,” O’Reilly said.

O’Reilly ran off a litany of incriminating dealings between Clinton, big business, and foreign nations and asked, “What am I supposed to think here Charles?”

Trey Gowdy explains to Greta: Benghazi report might hit before 2016 election, but what’s Hillary afraid of?

Krauthammer stated even with large money trails, criminal allegations against Clinton will be extremely difficult to prove. He argued the controversy needs to be looked at as a moral corruption rather than a legal corruption.

“There may not be enough evidence or explicit evidence of a criminal quid pro quo, but this is simply shady,” Krauthammer said.

A frustrated O’Reilly fired back, “But this is big!”

Krauthammer accused the Clinton’s of being experts at “walking the line” and covering their tracks.

“It’s big and it’s bad, but there’s one problem for those of us who are concerned about it,” Krauthammer said.

“She burned the tapes, she eliminated the emails.”

Unless someone can get evidence off of the servers Krauthammer said, “The evidence is gone.”

Related: 

‘Three lies in one sentence’: Hillary outdoes herself

Roseanne Barr says NO to Hillary: ‘I don’t care what’s in her shorts, she’s the same old s***’

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Comments are closed.

Latest Articles