If the emails being investigated by the House are any indication Hillary Clinton’s emails show a woman whose main concern is herself.
In a group of approximately 300 emails handed over to the House committee investigating the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi its apparent Clinton’s image was clearly her top priority.
In one email she sent to an advisor the same day House Republicans vigorously question a top State Department official she asked “Did we survive the day,” according to the New York Times.
The advisor responded affirmatively and informed the secretary that he would continue to monitor the situation.
According to the Times the emails show Clinton and her aides closely monitored the fallout from the attacks.
More importantly, they are clear proof Clinton wasn’t telling the truth when she said she always emailed aides on their government addresses so they would be recorded in compliance with federal regulations. Some clearly show she emailed them at their personal email accounts.
The descriptions of the emails were provided to the Times by four government officials on the condition of anonymity as they have not been made public.
The emails showed aides approved of then-United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice’s handling of the controversy when she appeared on Sunday news shows and blamed the attacks on a video.
“She did make clear our view that this started spontaneously then evolved,” Clinton’s deputy chief of staff Jake Sullivan wrote Clinton.
But as that narrative devolved in the coming weeks Sullivan sent a worried Clinton reassurance that she avoided the mistakes that were plaguing Rice.
“You never said ‘spontaneous’ or characterized their motivations,” he wrote her.
What the emails don’t show so far is any concern about getting to the truth about Benghazi.
It would be interesting to find out what the rest of her emails looked like if the server were examined.
If these 300 emails are any indication, it would be a whole lot of worrying about herself.
The Twitterverse weighed in with their thoughts on the latest twist in the “Emailgate” scandal.
— Michael S. Schmidt (@MichaelSSchmidt) March 23, 2015
— Barbara Day (@daynutrition) March 23, 2015
Surprisingly it doesn’t look like they are giving her a pass.
— wmark (@wmark728) March 23, 2015
— victor Jose rodrigue (@Grand1545) March 23, 2015
— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) March 23, 2015
— Agostini (@2Molinari) March 23, 2015
— Clarence Whorley (@ClarenceWhorley) March 23, 2015
— Bob Kirnum (@Rkirnum) March 23, 2015
— Andrew Siegel (@awsiegel) March 23, 2015
— heather courtney (@hc4cactus) March 23, 2015
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- Britney Spears shows off her rockin’ new bod, but had to spoil it with a liberal message about ‘Dreamers’ - December 24, 2017
- Border patrol forget they’re supposed to be heartless, deliver beautiful baby at the border - December 24, 2017
- After scoring tax cut victory, Trump sees ‘tremendous Democrat support’ for his next big initiative - December 24, 2017
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.