Who knew that Hillary Clinton was a literary critic?
The Washington Post asked likely 2016 presidential contender Hillary Clinton to review Henry Kissinger’s new book, “World Order,” much to the apparent chagrin of many on the left.
Hillary put as much ink to paper talking about her own foreign policy views as she did reviewing Kissinger’s book, but said his endeavor makes “a compelling case” for rebuilding “a political consensus to take on the perils and the promise of the 21st century.”
“His analysis, despite some differences over specific policies, largely fits with the broad strategy behind the Obama administration’s effort over the past six years to build a global architecture of security and cooperation for the 21st century,” she wrote.
And while her review reads much like a policy speech for her anticipated run for the White House, liberals wasted little time condemning her on Twitter for being a “neo-con” and for praising “a guy with lots of blood on his hands” — a Hollywood moon-bat even got in on the act:
Hillary Clinton Praises a Guy With Lots of Blood on His Hands http://t.co/KL49j1fNI6
— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) September 5, 2014
— Kevin Dunn (@ActorKevinDunn) September 6, 2014
— AtomicMountain (@AtomicMountain) September 6, 2014
@DavidCornDC funny… HRC sure has some strong NEO-CON thought’s- actually maybe she always has been more of HAWK than a Dove- touche’ RAND
— Greg ~ Mexico (@HESHNSON) September 5, 2014
In a sane world, a Hillary Clinton who proudly proclaims her friendship with Henry Kissinger would never be allowed near the White House. — Ian Actual (@iboudreau) September 6, 2014
- Candace Owens obliterates Michelle Obama’s racially oppressed narrative - May 11, 2021
- Teacher union head desperately tries to change subject under MacCallum grilling on indoctrination - May 11, 2021
- CNN reports on Fox News, while Fox News reports on real news like rockets fired toward Jerusalem - May 10, 2021