According to a pair of experts, state Sen. Chris McDaniel’s challenge of the results of the U.S. Senate race has little chance of success.
Six-term U.S. Sen. Thad Cochran won the heavily contentious senate race by more than 7,600 votes in the GOP primary runoff June 24. Tea party favorite McDaniel won the initial primary June 3 by 1,418 votes to force the runoff, but couldn’t break the 50-percent mark needed for victory.
The McDaniel campaign finally released, after weeks of promises, a report of all the alleged “illegal” votes for Cochran. While the numbers detailed — 3,500 illegal crossover votes in the GOP runoff from people who voted in the Democratic primary, 9,500 votes called by the campaign “irregular” and 2,500 allegedly improper absentee ballots — weren’t as massive as the McDaniel campaign claimed, the biggest problem with the challenge isn’t the numbers.
It’s what the McDaniel campaign is asking of the Mississippi Republican Party.
According to the challenge, McDaniel wants Cochran’s name removed from the November ballot and replaced with McDaniel’s, because it represents “the true will of Republican electors.”
There’s no mention of a new election.
University of California-Irvine political science professor and election law expert Rick Hasen said on his blog that not calling for a new election is one of the primary reasons the challenge will fail.
“Surely any election lawyer with some experience who would say that McDaniel will be declared the winner with this dossier is smoking something which I believe is still illegal in the state of Mississippi,” Hasen said on his blog. “Finally, I think it is clear that McDaniel should become a national member of the Fraudulent Fraud Squad. His website today still accuses Democrats of ‘stealing’ the election.
“It is a serious allegation, but one not backed by the evidence. Such charges are pernicious when they are not backed by proof. For weeks McDaniel promised that proof and has not delivered.”
One of the legal tent poles underpinning McDaniel’s challenge is also on shaky ground. The campaign alleges the runoff results were affected by “Democratic and illegal votes.” A state law that prevents voters from casting ballots in a primary unless they intend to support “the nominations made in the primary in which he participates” is considered largely unenforceable. The only way a voter’s intentions in the general election could be surmised would be via an open declaration to poll workers.
Read more at Watchdog.org.
By Steve Wilson | Mississippi Watchdog
Latest posts by Watchdog (see all)
- Billionaire Bloomberg attacks Fla. AG Pam Bondi, other AGs over opposing EPA regulations - November 10, 2015
- Over 10 percent of Florida adults are barred from voting - July 24, 2015
- Florida bill would implement online voter registration - May 15, 2015