Dems go after Inspector General who alerted lawmakers to IRS targeting scandal


Photo Source

Two Democrat lawmakers have picked up the mantle from President Obama in deflecting from the possibility that the IRS unfairly targeted conservative groups for extra scrutiny by going after the inspector general who first alerted lawmakers to the scandal.

The president drew heavy criticism from GOP lawmakers for saying there was “not even a smidgen of corruption” at the IRS during a Super Bowl pre-game interview with Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly, despite an ongoing FBI investigation.

But that investigation did not stop U.S. Reps. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., and Matt Cartwright, D-Penn., from filing a complaint “questioning the independence of Treasury Department inspector general J. Russell George,” The Washington Post reported.

Black residents reject Trader Joe’s because
it would attract too many white people

George, appointed by former President George W. Bush, released a report in May that said the IRS “used inappropriate criteria that identified for review Tea Party and other organizations applying for tax-exempt status,” according to the article.

The Washington Post further reported:

The congressmen, both of whom serve as top Democrats on House oversight committees, said George produced a “fundamentally flawed performance audit” that was “incomplete” and “outright misleading.”

They also alleged that he held briefings with Republican members of the House Oversight Committee without the knowledge of Democrats on the panel.

The article stated that George declined to comment, but “stood behind the findings of his review” of the agency and said “he may soon issue a formal response to the accusations.”

Ironically, Republican lawmakers have also criticized George, saying he should have notified Congress of the agency’s questionable behavior prior to the 2012 presidential election.

All of which goes to show just how popular whistle-blowers are in Washington, D.C., and the treatment they can expect when stepping on the toes of powerful lawmakers.

Tom Tillison

Tom Tillison

Tom is a grassroots activist who distinguished himself as one of the top conservative bloggers in Florida before joining BizPac Review.
Tom Tillison


16 thoughts on “Dems go after Inspector General who alerted lawmakers to IRS targeting scandal

  1. Ron Paul says:

    new world order coming!

  2. Ron Paul says:

    Certified Mail Number 7013 0600 0001 9040 9550


    In the Nature of A


    Att: Gil Reyes authorized
    representative for the IRS

    D.B.A. Employee Identification
    Number 10-0620860

    Internal Revenue Service, 130 South
    Elmwood Avenue

    Buffalo, New York near


    Buczek ©

    c/o Post Office 93-7335 Derby Road

    New York near [14047]




    Declarant ERROR! Reference source not found. ©, hereinafter
    know as “Declarant” or “Petitioner” states that he is competent to be a
    witness, that the Facts contained herein are True, Correct, Complete, & not
    misleading to the best of his firsthand knowledge & belief, under the penalties of
    perjury pursuant to the Laws of the De
    Jure united States of America.


    in Respondent’s Official Capacity serving the IRS Agent Gil Reyes based of a
    false Taxation presentment “PROOF OF
    CLAIM, was sent via Certified Mail Article Numbers: 7013 1710 0000 5947 6931, and Notice of Fault & Opportunity to Cure
    & Contest Acceptance sent via Certified Mail 7013 2630 0000 1146 5876 and
    CAFV, that granted Respondent Thirty days in which to respond to the Proofs of
    Claim contained therein with NON


    $ 113,145.11





    FOR $ 114,011.44 Gil Reyes has final cross the
    line now wants to steal from my kids for his
    unprecedented and despicable abuse of executive authority.

    Now Petitioner received no response to
    the CAFV from Respondent &
    therefore, issued a NOTICE OF DEFAULT
    & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE/CONTEST ACCEPTANCE, via Certified Mail Article Number,
    7013 2630 0000 1146 5876 which granted an additional three (3) days to
    Respondent to cure the above.

    Again the Petitioner
    received no response from Respondent
    regarding the Opportunity to Contest His Acceptance, Admission of All Facts,
    & Full Agreement to all the “TERMS” contained within the CAFV, therefore the Petitioner the
    Respondent via Certified Mail Article Number: 7013 0600 0001 9040 9550 a FINAL
    NOTICE OF DEFAULT/RES JUDICATA, declaring that via Respondents silent
    Acquiescence, the entire matter was now STARE DECISIS.

    an operation of Law, the Respondent is no in DEFAULT, admits full acceptance, & Agreement to all of the facts
    contained within CAFV via Respondents silent acquiescence. The CAFV is now STARE DECISIS & may NOT be controverter
    in any future administrative, civil, judicial, or commercial process &
    the following statement are “Admission of the Facts” contained within the CAFV, & is now the “TESTIMONY” of
    Respondent in representation of the IRS Agent Gil Reye s Therefore, Respondent
    hereby admits:

    1.) There
    is not a legitimate or outstanding claim
    or liability.

    2.) That
    due to the numerous violation of the IRS AGENT GIL REYESIRS OF TAXATION that
    any Jurisdiction, Authority, Decrees, Orders, Judgments, ECT, under CAN, are now rendered completely VOID.

    3.) There
    was either a lack of sound accounting procedures or no actual accounting done at all based on factual information.

    4.) That this originated out of
    speculation & hearsay & was an illegal fishing expedition to try &
    extort the undersigned just like the last 12 years of extortion are your family.

    no proof or factual documentation was provided or proved including the
    following that was specifically requested:

    a. A
    copy of the ledgers used to assess the alleged outstanding balance

    b. Copies
    of the supporting documentation used to establish the values listed in (a).

    c. All
    information in or regarding (a) & (b)

    d. A
    copy of all of the relevant codes &/ or case cities used in the assessment.

    e. All
    of the aforesaid submitted with an along stating that it is true & correct
    under the penalty of perjury.

    6.) That
    the IRS Agent Gil Reyes of the IRS of Taxation under CAN knowingly acted beyond their Corporate Charter & scope,
    & knowingly “DID NOT” have the
    Authority to violate doctrines of Good Faith, or clean hands while acting fraudulently & unlawfully
    incapacitating the Declarant to their detriment.

    7.) That
    “COMMITTED” Constitutional Impermissible Mis-Application of Statutes, Laws
    Codes, & the like, against the Declarant.

    That the Undersigned is NOT specifically named in IRS
    AGENT GIL REYESIRS OF TAXATION Code & more specifically IRC 6331 for the tax to be
    applied (See THE PEOPLE v. Herkimer, 4
    Cow. 345; 1825 N.Y. LEXIS 80).

    9.) That
    the Undersigned is NOT
    specifically ‘found’ within 26 U.S.C Section 6331 (a) & 6331 (a) & 3401
    (c) for the purposes of ‘taxation’!

    That the undersign never and NOT received notice that the Undersign
    is/was required to keep books & records.

    11.) That the Undersign is/was NOT in any manner notified that
    the Undersigned is/was the

    ‘subject’ & /or the ‘object’ of
    the income tax, (see Long v. Rasmussen, 281 F. 236. At

    238 (1922) & Economy Plumbing
    & Heating v. U.S., 470 F. 2nd 585, at 589 (1972).

    12.) That the Undersigned is/was NOT noticed that the tax is only
    applied to corporate

    activity. (see Doyle v. Mitchell Bros.,
    247 U.S. 179 (1989) & the Corporation Tax Act of 1909).

    13.) That the Undersigned has NOT been shown, in light of the
    above, that the Undersigned’s

    Livelihood, so-called Income,
    retirement, ect. is considered ‘income,’ having the aspect

    Of ‘gain & profit,’ (See South
    Pacific v. Lowe, 23R F. H41).

    14.) That the Undersigned has NOT been noticed that the
    Internal Revenue Service is NOT

    an agency of the United States. (see
    Distirct Court of Idaho Case #93-405-E-EJU11-19-


    15.) That the Undersigned has NOT been made aware of any
    specific contract (Implied or

    otherwise) with such ‘agency’ a
    part of the United States, to have some nexus or bearing

    to the ‘internal’ (taxing)
    affairs of the United States, as to some perceived ‘fair share’ on

    any interest payment & the
    national debt owed by the United States.

    That the Undersign has NOT
    been notice that the Undersigned is/was a party to the

    U.S. Constitution that would
    establish a nexus to any federal agency for any purpose

    not previously disclosed, aside
    from any secret or implied contracts entered

    into without full disclosure. (see Padleford, Fay & Co. v The Mayor
    & City of

    Savannah, 14 Ga. 438 (1854)

    That the Undersigned has NOT
    been disclosed of the ‘Interest’ the United States has

    in me/us, our property or same as applied
    to my/our debtor, how it was created (as to

    any pledge or hypothecation of my/our
    property) & ‘interest’ is NOT
    found or

    established in the corporate entity
    Debtor as identified on the IMF

    18.) That the Undersigned have NOT received any valid
    determination that has been

    Made identifying the Undersigned as a
    “U.S. person” as defined
    “Title 26 (Internal

    Revenue Code) at section 7701 (a)

    That the Undersigned has NOT been
    disclosed of the federal rule, law (with

    supporting implementing regulation) &
    /or any regulation that requires the

    Undersigned to pay an income tax.

    That the Undersign has NOT
    been noticed via your Letter of Determination of the

    Parties as to who the creditor & debtor
    is, in this matter.

    That title, full liability to the IRS Code or any other & that the tax
    imposed has NOT

    been proven to be lawfully binding upon
    the Undersigned in the Undersigned’s

    private capacity.

    lawfully enacted by an

    Act of Congress.

    That the tax imposed is laid against a corporate entity in regards to any

    Corporate activity, NOT upon the Undersigned in the Undersigned’s private
    capacity as flesh & man/women.

    That the Undersigned is NOT subject
    to or a party to the U.S. Constitution to

    establish any nexus to the federal
    government & to the IRS via any Act of Congress

    or tax laws passed by Congress.

    That the Undersigned is NOT
    subject to tax liability via any secret or implied

    contract or other agreement or contract,

    delivered a Letter of

    Determination of who the parties are in
    respect to the above account, as to who is

    the debtor.

    That there is NOT a federal
    law or regulation that the Undersigned is required to file

    In his/her private capacity.

    That the name on the IMF file is an “EO Nominee” or “EN LEGI,” for the of

    any tax upon some perceived corporate
    activity by an artificial corporate entity.

    That the Undersigned has NOT consented,
    agreed, or signed a contract allowing the Undersigned’s ‘private’ property to
    be pledged & / or taken in any manner to discharge any tax debt.

    That the Undersigned has NOT
    received or provided any
    consideration and have not provided any performance to which I am indebted by
    an instrument that bears my signature. UCC 3-401(a). Please exhibit the instrument that contains
    my signature, obligating me to your demand(s), under agreement. UCC-1-201(3).

    the Undersigned has NOT received a signed contract alleged above the name and
    identity of the man/woman certifying under penalty of perjury that we owe
    you/and/or to the Corporation named herein above a debt, the date of the
    assessment, the authority of the man/woman to make the assessment(s).

    the Undersigned has NOT been
    identified as a ‘U.S. Person’ as defined
    at Section 7701 (n) (30) in Title 26 (Internal revenue Code) sign under penalty
    of perjury pursuant to IRC 6065.

    That the United States is bankrupt &/ or insolvent & the Undersigned
    has no access to lawful money of account to ‘pay’ debts (tax(es)) at law in
    respect to Article 1, Section X of the U.S. Constitution as it operates upon
    the agent of government.

    That the Understand has NOT
    been given or afforded a DUE PROCESS
    HEARING in respect to any tax liability or at the hearing that full
    disclosure was made as to any commercial scheme applied to the Undersigned or
    to some corporate entity ( straw-man or
    Ens legis) as named on your presentments.

    That the income tax imposed via Title 26 is laid
    against a corporate fiction as Identified on all IRS files, documents, &
    presentments in capital name spelling similar to the undersigned’s name.

    That the Undersigned’s ‘labor’ is NOT
    a taxable commodity or an ‘article’ of commerce via any Congressional
    exclusive legislative. (See IS V.S.C. Section 17).

    That any ‘labor’ taxed is laid upon the ‘corporate’ fiction/entity as
    identified by Debtor’s name in all capital letters as appearing on accounts,
    files (IMF & BMF), & all communiqué’s sent by the IRS to the ‘corporate
    fiction/entity’ in regards to its ‘corporate activity’ as established by the

    That the undersigned does NOT live
    within a ‘Federal Zone’ for the purpose of taxation as a ‘citizen’ or

    That the ‘corporate fiction/entity’/Debtor IS
    the ‘entity’ that effectively ‘lives’ within a Federal Zone & is the RES-(thing) IDENT, as identified on accounts,
    files (IMF & BMF), & all communiqué’s sent by the IRS.

    That the undersigned can NOT be
    ‘punished’ by the United States Supreme Court as to such & certain decision
    for relying upon any decision may be directed towards the actions or
    limitations of government &/or respect to the ‘rights’ of the undersigned.

    That the undersigned is NOT a
    citizen of the United States as definded in 26 C.F.R. Section 31.312(e) – I
    that would subject the undersigned to the legislative jurisdiction of the
    United States. SEE RECORDING: IN
    Broward County Florida INSTR 1069011185
    OR BK 43724 Pages 1483-1504 RECORDED 03/09/2007 15:23:33 BROWARD COUNTY

    26 USC Section 6013 (g) (4) TERMINATION OF ELECTION also recorded at the County
    Court House

    That the undersigned is NOT receiving
    any ‘compensation’ from the Federal government as ‘private’ man/women
    ‘Citizen’, aka. ‘sovereign’ & is not performing in any degree an occupation
    of common right.

    That the undersigned is NOT engaged
    in a ‘TRADE OR BUSINESS’ which includes the performing of the functions of a
    public office.” (See 26 U.S.C. Section 7701 (8) (26)).

    That the Judgment/action/cause of Sentence rendered under CAN was “VOID” from its inception & that the Declarant
    should be immediately released of all implication & may proceed with
    applicable remedy of choice & that the Declarant is due Restitution for the years of fraud like
    back in 2004/2005 where all of our checks went from the people we worked
    straight to the IRS in Buffalo New York with no DUE PROCESS! Also years of lost
    wages, damages, & Injuries caused by the underlying Fraud of the Unlawful

    Credit card application, mortgage, and taxes are fraud see also Title 26 which
    that it is also unlawful, illegal, therefore we are not bound to be liable to
    pay any of them. With fractional reserve banking-All money is loaned into
    existence, there is no money, all there is It’s negotiable debt instruments
    and all currency, what we call money, is only loaned into existence and by
    signing credit card applications, mortgage applications, and what above the
    alleged taxes; where is the lawful contract in existence? All applications with
    the act of providing our signature we are creating money that did not exist at
    the moment we signed our signature. Now where are the signatures on both
    parties on the alleged tax issued? Where is the lawful contract in existence? Where
    is the lawful money claimed to be owed? Before your Agents of such
    corporation proceed any further collection activity, please furnish me with an
    affidavit, signed under penalty of perjury with the implementing regulation(s)
    that gives the statutes you are relying on, the force of law, real law that
    applies to me (please see the cited here in above). Please include a copy of
    the Delegation of Authority Order that gives you assessment, lien, and levy
    authority. Please include me with proof of your claim that you maintain a
    security interest, UCC 1-201(37) (A).


    1.) “The
    right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
    against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no
    Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
    affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
    persons or things to be seized.”No individual – and especially no federal
    agency – is above the law. Regrettably, and largely through both citizen and
    government acquiescence, the IRS has been brandishing arbitrary and
    extra-constitutional authority, unchecked, for well over a century.

    2.) “Grace Commission” (Confirmed that virtually
    ALL taxes actually go to the Federal Reserve Bank to pay interest on the U.S.
    debt to the banking families that own the International Monetary Fund (IMF):
    “With two-thirds of everyone’s personal income taxes wasted or not collected,
    100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal
    debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other
    words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent
    on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government.” J. Peter Grace,
    Cover letter, President’s Private Sector Report on Cost Control, January 12,
    1984. Peter Grace was considered the Warren Buffett of his time and the Grace
    Commission Report received widespread media attention as the gospel of Reagan’s
    so-called tax system overhaul.) ( or

    3.) “Caha v. US, 152
    U.S. 211 (1894)” (U.S. regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and
    the District of Columbia. “The laws of Congress in respect to those matters
    [outside of Constitutionally delegated powers] do not extend into the
    territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of
    Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the
    national government.”)

    4.) “U.S. v. Spelar,
    338 U.S. 217 at 222.” (U.S. regulations apply only within the U.S. territories
    and the District of Columbia. “There is a canon of legislative construction
    which teaches Congress that, unless a contrary intent appears [legislation] is
    meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”)

    5.) “Downes v.
    Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901).” (Purportedly decided if the constitution applies
    to U.S. territories. In actuality, unleashed the great fraud of unlimited
    statutory power misapplied throughout the continental United States of America.
    Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan. “…two national governments, one
    to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other
    to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by
    exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to…a
    radical and mischievous change in our system of government will result…We will,
    in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and
    protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism…It
    will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of a government outside
    the supreme law of the land finds lodgment in our constitutional
    jurisprudence.” In other words, a genuine de jure united States of America
    congress is always bound to enact laws within the jurisdiction of the
    constitution. He held to the obvious truth that congress does not exist, let
    alone have powers, outside the constitution. Harlan said, “This nation is under
    the control of a written constitution, the supreme law of the land and the only
    source of the powers which our government, or any branch or officer of it, may
    exert at any time or at any place.”)

    6.) “28 USC 3002”
    (definition of the United States as a Federal corporation never taught in
    civics class; go to paragraph 15) (—-000-.html )

    7.)“27 CFR 72.11”
    (U.S. Inc. defines all crime as commercial as a result of the fall of the
    republic when the South walked out of congress in 1861 and the de jure
    congress, unable to raise a quorum, was replaced by Lincoln with the de facto
    corporate Congress; and the de jure district court of the United States was
    replaced by the de facto corporate UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (

    8.) “Executive Order
    6102” (government’s confiscation of your family’s gold and wealth under threat
    of 10 years in prison for failure to comply. As the Order specifies U.S.
    “persons” (eg. JOHN SMITH and JANE DOE), law enforcement was duped into
    enforcing against the general public a command that only applied to Federal
    employees and members of the armed forces.) ( or“HJR 192” (outlawing
    of the simple act of “paying with money” as a felony by substituting the
    lawyer’s parlor trick of “discharging”debts)( or

    9.)“Congressman Louis McFadden speech” (indictment of the
    Secretary of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board of Governor’s for
    treason by the chairman of the House Banking and Currency committee in 1934. In
    scathing speeches to Congress, McFadden said: “(The Fed) has impoverished and
    ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has
    practically bankrupted our Government.” This most knowledgeable man on banking
    also explained in vivid detail the method for recruiting the Federal Reserve to
    pay our debts as holder of the gold, and which is at the heart of today’s “tax
    remedies.”) ( and

    10.) “Lewis
    v. United States 680” (Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned: “…we conclude
    that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the
    FTCA (Federal Tort Claims Act), but are independent, privately owned and
    locally controlled corporations.” Lewis v United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th
    Cir. 1982). In other words, the Fed enjoys no United States immunity from law
    suit because it is a Federal institution in name only.

    ( and “Modern Money Mechanics” (The
    Fed’s concise operational manual showing how money AND INTENTIONAL INFLATION
    are created from thin air by the Fed and its member banks. The manual is very
    clear as to the power of created inflation to speed the process of confiscating
    your wealth.

    two-thirds of everyone’s personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100
    percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt
    and by federal government contributions to transfer payments. In other words,
    all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the
    services [that] taxpayers expect from their government.


    lack of Response on your part means a fault, UCC 1-201(16) exist, creating
    fraud through material misrepresentation which vitiates all forms, contracts,
    etc, expressed or implied, from the beginning, UCC-1-103. RESPONSE

    Third Party within (10) ten days

    & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE, is attached hereto, containing the complete list of
    inquiries/proofs of claim submitted to Respondent, IRS Representative, &
    the evidence of the Declarant of his Administrative Process.

    Third Party’s Name


    Susan E. Hines All Rights Reserved/ UCC 1-308

    Care of 367 Brookwood Drive

    Hamburg, New York near [140475]

    [Non-Domestic] [Dmm 602 1.3e (2)]


    Compliance with Title 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1746 (1) & executed WITHOUT THE UNITED
    STATES, I affirm under the penalties of perjury, & to the laws of the De
    Jure united States of America, that the foregoing is true, correct &
    complete to the best of my belief & informed knowledge, & Further the
    Deponent Saith Not. I now affix my seal and Autograph & Official Seal to
    WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OF THOSE RIGHTS, in compliance with UCC Section 1-308:


    Dated: January
    , 2014 Sincerely



    Secured Party Creditor

    Representative For & in Behalf of


    Without Prejudice

    UCC 1-308/UCC

  3. Vick's Dog says:

    miscreant Soros zombies– they act more and more like his Nazis everyday–they don’t do squat except cheat at elections and do what that Sheila Jackson Lee trash says–write Executive Orders for 0-blome

  4. flyr says:

    Very similar to the performance of Barney Frank and members of the Congressional Black Cacus when OTHELLO was auditing the GSE’s . Bush was calling for Congress to clean up the GSE’s but the democrats blocked the effort, protecting Raines and Gorelick and setting up a major domino in the economic collapse. Same accusations of racism etc. Thankfully all preserved on utube.

    Gorlick (GSE’s chief legal officer) and Raines stole tens of millions in bonuses based on fabricated profits that would have embarrassed Enron. Both should still be in jail but Obama rescued them as payback for their donations and silence.

Comments are closed.

Related Posts