Just another delusional day on Twitter for Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Within a span of 4 hours, U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz managed to so thoroughly contradict herself that it leaves one to wonder how on earth can she take herself seriously.

Endeavoring to impress upon a gullible public that she and her cohorts in the Democratic Party are the reasonable ones, Wasserman Schultz tweeted a link Sunday to an editorial she wrote on ending obstructionism and pushing for a more constructive dialogue:

Twitter users, to include Twitchy founder Michelle Malkin, were quick to point out the absurdity in such a remark — Wasserman Schultz told Malkin last week that she would be “eating” her words next year in regard to Obamacre.

National ‘Chick-PHIL-A Day’ to support free speech explodes; wear camos

As captured by Twitchy:

A short four hours later, Wasserman Schultz proves her critics right in a tweet that makes a mockery of her early tweet — keep in mind that 163 Democrats, to include Wasserman Schultz, voted for the budget deal that failed to extend unemployment benefits:

Twitter user Brad Jobe let the chair of the Democratic National Committee know just how delusional she really is, which may explain why many on the left dislike Twitter:


Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
Tom Tillison


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.


Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Comments are closed.

Latest Articles