Emails indicate IRS disclosed confidential taxpayer info to White House

[sharenow]
Sarah Hall Ingram
ScreenShot via CSpan3

Yet again, the Obama White House is mixed up in potential Internal Revenue Service violations that have some making the comparisons to the Nixon Watergate scandal.

It appears that the top IRS official in charge of Obamacare, Sarah Hall Ingram, may have released confidential taxpayer information to the White House, which would be in violation of the law, and also inappropriately counseled White House officials on the “legal challenges from groups who claimed Obamacare infringed on their religious liberties,” the Washington Free Beacon reported.

Emails between Ingram and White House officials discussing the contraception mandate were given to U.S. Rep. Darrel Issa’s House Oversight Committee, but redactions in the emails, using IRS code “6103 – which prohibits the IRS agents from releasing tax return information,” suggest confidential taxpayer information was, indeed, disclosed, the article said.

Issa has demanded the unredacted emails be sent to the committee, which also determined that the “emails show Hall Ingram and others at the IRS violated the agency’s role as an impartial administrator of the tax code by advising the White House on a politically controversial subject.”

During testimony before the committee Wednesday, Ingram said she “could not recall what was underneath the redactions,” and the following exchange between U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio and Ingram was reported by the Free Beacon:

“In that correspondence that resulted in most of those cases being dismissed, you shared personal taxpayer information with the White House,” Jordan said. “And now under the Affordable Care Act, Americans have to give personal information to the IRS—to the same organization that potentially shared all kinds of information with the White House political people. That’s what people are nervous about. That’s what scares a lot of people.”

“I cannot answer what is under those blocks, so I can’t answer whether that information originated with the White House,” Hall Ingram responded.

“So it was OK for political White House to get the unredacted version from the same entity that targeted groups who came into existence because they opposed the Affordable Care Act, but Congress can’t get it?” Jordan continued. “That’s unbelievable.”

Dan Epstein, executive director for Cause of Action, a non-profit government accountability group, made the comparison to Watergate to the Free Beacon saying, “If in fact the White House received confidential taxpayer information, then we have a White House that is complicit in the biggest violation of the law since Nixon.”

More from the Washington Free Beacon.

[poll id=”123″]

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.
[sharenow]

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles