Hollywood Remains Deaf, Dumb And Blind To The Crimes Of Communist And Muslim Regimes

By Norman Berdichevsky

Two of the most honestly gruesome films of barbaric atrocities in modern times ever made are the Russian film ‘The Chekist’ and the Polish film ‘Katyn’.

The Chekist’ was directed by Aleksandr Rogozhkin (1992 Cannes Film Festival Award) but hardly rated mention anywhere in the United States. The unbelievable atrocities of torture and mass execution seen in the film were all confirmed by factual articles in Pravda in 1921-22.

Katyn is the true story of the slaughter of 22,000 Polish officers on April, 1940 by Stalin’s henchmen and based on the book Post Mortem: The Story of Katyn by Anderzj Mularczyk. It was nominated for Best Foreign Language Film. The Russian leadership has admitted the guilt of Stalin in the Katyn massacre, finally turned into a dramatic film in the 2007 Polish production.

It is an emotionally horrifying and draining experience to view these films. Both these films’ producers and actors have been brutally honest enough to graphically portray the unvarnished horror of the Communist regimes to their fellow citizens in Poland and Russia, something no Hollywood producer has dared to do and about which, most of the American public shows no interest.

Contrast this with the host of brilliant anti-Nazi films made during World War II that established Hollywood’s ‘patriotic reputation’ and the naked fact that no serious major Hollywood feature film has dealt with the epic battle against totalitarian communism. The films with a major international political theme made before American entry into the war hardly touched on the Soviet Union except for a light comedy like Ninotchka (MGM 1939).

Contrast magnificent films with the hundreds of World War II, spy, Spanish Civil War (For Whom the Bell Tolls) and Holocaust films made since 1945 that continued to use the wartime anti-Nazi theme but never about any of the real life opponents of the Axis who were prominent in the anti-Nazi cause and Resistance yet were conservative even ‘Rightwing’ nationalist leaders such as Churchill, De Gaulle, Iannos Metaxas of Greece, Arne Sorensen of the rightwing group Dansk Samling and Engelbert Dollfuss of Austria (see my book The Left is Seldom Right, chapters 12-18).

The Fountainhead” (1949) stands out as the ONLY film of a political nature that intellectually argued against the Leftist themes of solidarity, the plight of the poor, the ‘just struggle’ of the working class, the ‘new society’ created in Soviet Russia and the greed of the wealthy and privileged.

On the theme of the Cold War and the struggle of subject peoples under Soviet and Chinese Communist rule , there was essentially nothing but a few trivial Grade C films (for example –‘I married a Communist’ that had to be re-released under the less obvious titles of ‘The Woman on Pier 13’ and ‘Beautiful but Dangerous’. Critics trashed the film for its ‘fatuous plot and cartoon characters’ yet as a dramatic work it probably compares favorably with “the greatest film of all time’ – Casablanca, differing only in the identity of the ‘bad guys’.

The struggle to resist communism and the Cold War did not lead any American producers to create a serious dramatic film involving the Hitler-Stalin Pact, the Gulags, the now thoroughly vindicated charges of treason against the Rosenbergs, the evidence of Whittaker Chambers against Alger Hiss, the Korean War, the Hungarian Revolution, the Cultural Revolution in China, Pol Pot, Ceausescu, the GDR or the collapse of the USSR.

Can one imagine a director such as Steven Spielberg (Schindler’s List) dealing with any of these themes? Abroad, there have been a few serious British attempts such as Dr. Zhivago (1965) and One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovitch (1971).

Americans who have seen “The Sound of Music” were offered a sugar coated, romanticized and typically exaggerated Hollywood version of Austria’s crisis but it did contain a grain of truth – that the real as well as the cinematic hero, Captain Von Trapp, a conservative, aristocratic, devout Catholic retired naval officer, is symbolic of those among the country’s social elite who held the Nazis in utter contempt as gutter rabble.

The same people whom Stalin had referred to as “Christian Fascists” (Dollfuss, the Heimwehr and Prince Starhemberg) who had crushed the working class Social Democrats’ Schutzbund uprising in Vienna in 1934, were the same ones who tried vainly to oppose the Nazis’ repeated sabotage and coup attempts to force union with Germany.

What is indeed accurate about ‘The Sound of Music’ is not the tearful rendition of ‘Edelweiss’ that rouses the Austrian patriotism of Captain Von Trapp’s neighbors (the song was composed by American Jewish composer Oscar Hammerstein), but the teenage working class neighborhood boy Rolf,  in love with the captain’s eldest daughter, Liesl. He becomes the most enthusiastic Nazi and turns the family in out of his sense of duty and loyalty to Hitler.

This has its counterpart in the other great musical film about the 1930s political situation, – ‘Cabaret’, where the only individual seated in a park who does not rise to join in the enthusiastic singing of a Nazi anthem “The future belongs to us” (just as our 60s radical believed), is an elderly man who had been through World War I.

During the period of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Non-Aggression Pact in which the Nazis and Soviets were close allies, the Soviet attack against Finland in December 1939 provoked screenwriter Philip Dunne and actor Melvin Douglas to propose that the Motion Picture Democratic Committee, a group of activists identified with the Democratic Party, condemn the invasion. A hardcore insider group of Communist Party members using the organization as a congenial front insured the defeat of the resolution.

In his 1980 memoir, aptly named “Take Two: A Life in Movies and Politics”, Dunne wrote “All over town, the industrious communist tail wagged the lazy liberal dog.”  And so it has been ever since. This was noted in the 1930s by screenwriter Ayn Rand, the only one in Hollywood who had actually lived under communism. Communist party member Dalton Trumbo, known as the highest paid screenwriter in the business was a Communist Party member and viewed his profession as ‘literary guerilla warfare’.

To gauge the influence of Trumbo and others in whitewashing Stalin and the Soviet regime, one has to view such films as North Star and Song of Russia (both 1943) that portray the USSR as a land of workers and peasants living in simplicity but in dignity and abundance and dutifully following the guidelines of the Party.

Even worse, Mission to Moscow (1943) starring no less a luminary than Walter Huston accepted the charges of the 1930s purge trials against Stalin’s former comrades and ‘explained’ how the USSR had ‘generously’ offered Finland five times more land (barren tundra) in exchange for the important security zone along the Karelian isthmus it had demanded just before launching its invasion in 1939.

Trumbo bragged in The Daily Worker that thanks to him and communist influence in Hollywood, the Party had quashed adaptations of Arthur Koestler’s anti-communist works, Darkness at Noon and The Yogi and the Commissar.

It is precisely this point that most of the House un-American Activities Committee missed in its investigations, the internal network within the screenwriters union in sympathy with the party line rather than the specific content of individual films that might be excused as part of the war-time patriotic effort  to cast our Soviet ally in the best possible light. The evidence is provided by the Venona documents and the memoirs of Hollywood personnel involved in the Communist dominated union activity and studio policies led to the justified investigations by the House Un-American Activities Committee.

What is all the more notable is that the House Un-American Activities Committee was at first strongly supported by the Communist Party–USA (CPUSA) when first introduced in 1933 on direct orders from Moscow because it was involved in uncovering Nazi and then later Trotskyite activities.

The actors and directors among the approximately 50 witnesses called to testify by the Committee who took the Fifth Amendment hundreds of times and were temporarily ‘blacklisted’ have entered the pantheon of Leftist Americana as the victims of the evil, racist, anti-Semitic, right-wing reaction as memorialized by those who idealize and idolize all those who testified before the committee and in the best of all scenarios were naïve dupes.

This was soon realized by a host of actors such as Ronald Reagan, Barbara Stanwyck, Lana Turner, Bette Davis, Humphrey Bogart, Danny Kaye, Gene Kelly and Lauren Bacall who originally went to the hearings with the intent of defending their studio bosses from what they thought might be slander and guilt by association but realized that the Communist Party was indeed strongly enmeshed in the studio’s choice and rejection of scripts.

They were active in the IATSE (International Alliance of Theatrical Stage employees) while the Communist party-backed CSU (Conference of Studio Unions) attempted to force the studios to deal only with them. Even in the private field of talent scout agencies working with the major studios such as the William Morris agency, the Party had managed to obtain sufficient influence to steer the scripts of Communist writers and directors such as Ring Lardner Jr. and Bernard Gordon on to the desks of producers while soft-pedaling the work of their non-communist clients.

In 1999, the University of Southern California which is notable for its film school unveiled a sculpture garden dedicated to “The Hollywood Ten” who were blacklisted as ‘victims’ of the Cold War and heroes honored for their “Protection of the First Amendment”  by refusing to testify. This is the result of the continued preference by many in Hollywood for wishing to ‘See, Hear and Smell No Evil’ because they are committed to the prevailing ideal of those in the profession whose first allegiance is to anti-anti-Communism.

What has Hollywood produced lately?; ‘Reds’ in 1981 in which Oscar winning Warren Beatty plays American journalist and witness to the Russian Revolution, John Reed, who makes the concession that the Soviet regime indeed “violates human rights” but nothing on the screen graphically portrays these violations.

And Today? In the face of outrageous slaughter by the regime of Saddam Hussein and Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad (35,000 killed; mostly civilians, or those armed with small weapons versus the full might of the Syrian armed forces) we have ‘Syriana’, in which America’s involvement in the Middle East and its attempt to confront Islamist fanaticism is held to be solely based on oil. It portrays the Arabs, the Arab states and Arab-Americans as the unfortunate victims of the global conspiracies and machinations of the CIA.

As long as they oppose the United States, even the most vicious, 8th century doctrine of fundamentalist Islam with its proclamation of Jihad and its denial of any civil rights or liberties, its record of violent anti-Jewish hatred, its contempt for the elementary rights of women and children, still qualify as ‘the good guys’. Where are the massive street demonstrations today of the type that seized headlines for months against American intervention in Iraq or Afghanistan? They are nowhere. There are none, apart from a few Syrian exiles parading in front of the Syrian embassy in Paris – that is the measure of the conscience of the Left.


Norman Berdichevsky is a native New Yorker who lives in Orlando, Florida. He holds a Ph.D. in human geography from the University of Wisconsin-Madison (1974) and is the author of The Danish-German Border Dispute (Academica Press, 2002), Nations, Language and Citizenship (McFarland & Co., Inc., 2004), Spanish Vignettes; An Offbeat Look into Spain’s Culture, Society & History (Santana Books, Malaga, Spain. 2004), An Introduction to Danish Culture (MacFarland, 2011) and The Left is Seldom Right (New English Review Press, 2011). He is the author of more than 200 articles and book reviews that have appeared in a variety of American, British, Danish, Israeli and Spanish periodicals such as World Affairs, Journal of Cultural Geography, Ecumene, Ariel, Ethnicity, The World & I, Contemporary Review, German Life, Israel Affairs, and Midstream. He is also a professional translator from Hebrew and Danish to English and his website is here.




Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles