“The Imperial Presidency” was written in 1973 out of Arthur Schlesinger’s concern that the U.S. presidency had exceeded its constitutional limitations. If Schlesinger were merely concerned in 1973, he’d be downright terrified today.
According to Trevor Loudon’s blog, New Zeal, an American Caesar has emerged on the political landscape in the form of our current commander-in-chief.
New Zeal bases its premise on the Presidential Appointment and Streamlining Act (S. 679), which is stampeding through the Senate with Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., clutching at its reins. Since its introduction, seven Republicans jumped on board in support.The stated purpose of the bill is “to reduce the number of executive positions subject to Senate confirmation.” What? Maybe you’ll want to read that again.
The president created a furor when he appointed at least 32 czars to his administration two years ago. The main objection was the fact that all the appointees were exempt from Senate confirmation.
The Heritage Foundation found that the bill violates the appointments clause of the Constitution, as well as the spirit of “separation of powers,” which forms the basis for our government. Further, the bill transfers some of the Senate’s powers to the president. Our founders feared above all else the concentration of power within a single branch of government, the very thing this bill achieves.
A second matter under consideration was reported in a recent Wall Street Journal opinion piece, appropriately titled, “Obama’s Gangster Politics.” It describes a proposed executive order requiring that government contractors report all political contributions they made, and to whom they made them. It similarly requires that the officers and directors of those companies disclose their political contributions. In other words, it creates an “enemies list” and codifies “pay to play” in one fell swoop.
Our electoral process is based upon free political discourse, including campaign contributions. This order has a huge chilling effect on political speech, stifles political thought and assures that the party in power remains in power.
As for “pay to play,” can you imagine being in a war zone and relying on a piece of body armor purchased on the basis of political patronage?
The liberal media has lately supported party disclosure. Congressman Allen West, however, recognizes it as another example of political patronage – rewarding friends and punishing enemies.
Separation of powers isn’t just a phrase in a sound bite; it’s a principle that has to be zealously defended, or this republic will fall just as certainly as the one in ancient Rome.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Act like a grownup’: Drunk driver sobs when she loses plea deal by coming 4 hours late to court - July 23, 2017
- ‘I would’ve fired her the day I met her’: Glenn Beck reveals more about Tomi Lahren mess - July 23, 2017
- Canadian thug beats 74-year-old cyclist bloody with a club in road rage fit– and they say US is more violent? - July 23, 2017
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
