Editor’s Note – The timing of this report could not be more relevant. This story is all about social justice and reparations, both of which are sentiments that Obama believes in. That and political expediency; ‘dancing with the one that brung ya’.
So, to those who’s lives where destroyed simply because of the color of the dealership owners skin color, where is the equality? Where is the justice?
What happened to the notion that two wrongs don’t make a right?
Race Played Role in Obama Car Dealer Closures
By William Tate
The Obama administration, already under fire for unprecedented allegations of racial bias, faces a new bias claim from a most unlikely source: one of the administration’s own inspectors general.
Decisions on which car dealerships to close as part of the auto industry bailout — closures the Obama administration forced on General Motors and Chrysler — were based in part on race and gender, according to a report by Troubled Asset Relief Program Special Inspector General Neal M. Barofsky.
[D]ealerships were retained because they were recently appointed, were key wholesale parts dealers, or were minority- or woman-owned dealerships. [Emphasis added.]
Thus, to meet numbers forced on them by the Obama administration, General Motors and Chrysler were forced to shutter other, potentially more viable, dealerships. The livelihood of potentially tens of thousands of families was thus eliminated simply because their dealerships were not minority- or woman-owned.
As has been widely reported, the Inspector General’s study skewered the Obama Gang for strong-arming the companies into closing 2,000 dealerships, costing an estimated 100,000 people their jobs during a recession.
But the news media has ignored key elements of Barofsky’s report — elements that are far more damaging, if possible, to Obama. As we reported earlier in the week, a top Obama official, manufacturing czar and “Auto Team” leader Ron Bloom admitted that the dealerships could have been kept open, saving those jobs, “but that doing so would have been inconsistent with the President’s mandate for ‘shared sacrifice.'”
Barofsky says the administration insisted on the closings even though a GM official told him;
that GM would usually save ‘not one damn cent’ by closing any particular dealership. … Furthermore, a GM official stated that removing a dealership from the network does not save money for GM — it might even cost GM money — and that savings cannot be attributed or assigned to any one dealership.
And a reading of the IG’s study makes plain that some dealership closings forced by the administration were based largely on politics.
That is where raw, hard, sewage-filled Chicago politics came into play.
Records indicate that in 2008, Obama lost the vote totals in the nation’s 1,300 rural counties by nearly 80%.
The Obama administration’s insistence on radical numbers of closures ended up shuttering dealerships in those rural areas disproportionately, while dealerships and jobs in metro areas — Obama’s geographical base — were left open.
- Shareholders take action against ‘woke’ Coke, warning they’ll ‘seek judicial relief’ - June 21, 2021
- Taser and knife-wielding madman with 10 priors released without bail by NYC judge - June 21, 2021
- Misguided embrace of mob justice doesn’t end well for ‘blue check’ who took on Ann Coulter - June 21, 2021