Kevin Daley, DCNF
Judge William Alsup of the federal district court in San Francisco, Calif., ordered the Trump administration to continue administering the Deferred Actions for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program late Tuesday.
Just two weeks ago, the Supreme Court overturned one of Alsup’s orders in a DACA-related controversy.
Alsup, a President Bill Clinton appointee, is presiding over the University of California’s (UC) legal challenge to DACA’s termination. UC’s chancellor is Janet Napolitano, the former secretary of homeland security who presided over DACA’s promulgation during the Obama administration.
In connection with that litigation, the judge issued a sweeping discovery order in October 2017 requiring the Trump administration to furnish all documents relating to DACA’s cancellation. The government previously provided some 250 records concerning its decision, but UC argued such a decision would have generated a larger body of work. The Department of Justice (DOJ) countered that many of those documents, like internal correspondence between federal officials, were subject to privilege.
Alsup disagreed, prompting an appeal which reached the Supreme Court in December.
In a 5-4 ruling issued Dec. 8, the justices temporarily lifted Alsup’s order, though the majority did not reveal its reasons for doing so. The order was fairly remarkable, as the Supreme Court does not generally involve itself in discovery disputes. The ruling provoked a short dissent from Justice Stephen Breyer, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan.
In a second ruling issued two weeks later on Dec. 22, the high court ordered Alsup to reconsider two government arguments about the court’s power to review DACA’s termination before making a final determination on the shielded federal documents. The second ruling appears to be a compromise among the justices, as there were no noted dissents.
“The government makes serious arguments that at least portions of the district court’s order are overly broad,” the decision reads.
The administration can appeal Alsup’s Tuesday order to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Send tips to [email protected].
The Daily Caller News Foundation is working hard to balance out the biased American media. For as little as $3, you can help us. Make a one-time donation to support the quality, independent journalism of TheDCNF. We’re not dependent on commercial or political support and we do not accept any government funding.
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- The Florida candidate laser-focused on eradicating horrific animal crimes - March 22, 2024
- Sabo: ‘Rush was our GOAT, there was no equal and he made it look easy’ - February 18, 2024
- Dana Bash appears to want to crawl out of her own skin when Ramaswamy ‘goes there’ on J6 - December 7, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
