Sen. Rubio slams Apple for hypocrisy of its deals with Chinese violators of Internet freedom

DCNFEric Lieberman, DCNF

(Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida questioned Appleā€™s business intentions in China, arguing Wednesday that the U.S.-based corporation is being very hypocritical in order to gain entry into the worldā€™s largest human market.

During a congressional hearingĀ titledĀ ā€œThe Long Arm of China: Exporting Authoritarianism With Chinese Characteristics,ā€ Rubio specifically called out Apple and its CEO Tim Cook for celebrating Chinaā€™s purported vision of an open internet.

ā€œThis is where you come into this absurd situation where the World Internet Conference is held in China, meant to promote Chinaā€™s vision of cyber sovereignty, which all of you have talked about,ā€ he said to aĀ panelĀ of diverse experts. ā€œBasically the idea that governments all over the world should have the right to control what appears on the internet in their countries.ā€

Rubio said the dystopian irony of China ā€” a country which was just given theĀ titleĀ of the worstĀ abuserĀ of internet freedom for a third year in a row ā€” hosting the summit is just the proverbial tip of the iceberg.

ā€œThe most confusing part of it all is that Apple CEO Tim Cook stood up at that conference, and he celebrated Chinaā€™s vision of an open internet. He delivered the keynote speech on the opening day of that gathering,ā€ Rubio continued, adding that so did higher-ups at fellow American tech companiesĀ GoogleĀ and Cisco.

The impassioned lawmaker said Apple is openly capitulating to U.S.ā€™s foreign adversary, all in the name of profits. What makes it worse, Rubio says, is that Apple and its leaders often ā€œlecture us about free speech and human rightsā€ and problems here in America.

And then Apple goes ā€œabroadĀ and are fully cooperative on some grotesque violation of human rights because thereā€™s a lot of money to be made, and they donā€™t want to offend their host country.ā€

Rubio highlights how after ChinaĀ orderedĀ tech companies operating (or wishing to operate) in the country to shut people off from virtual private networks (VPNs).Ā The technological capability gives users the ability to navigate the web anonymously through an encrypted, secure connection. VPNs empower Chinese citizensĀ with the ability to circumvent the countryā€™s firewall (also known as the Great Firewall of China), which forbids people from accessing many online services and sites.

Apple reportedly agreed to remove more than 600 apps that offer VPN services, and it alsoĀ purgedĀ Skype, a popular communication service, from its app store specifically for China, according to The New York Times.

ā€œSo again, hereā€™s an example of a company, in my view, so desperate to have access to the Chinese market place that they are willing to follow the laws of that country even if those laws run counter to what those companiesā€™ own standards are supposed to be,ā€ Rubio asserted.

Somewhat ironically, Apple told a regulatory agency in IndiaĀ it cannot introducean anti-spam app on its platform because the company feared it would violate peopleā€™s privacy.

Rubio has been, at least to a certain extent, a stalwart for people andĀ organizations with concernsĀ that U.S. tech companies are doing whatever it takes to penetrate the Chinese market. HeĀ pressedĀ a Facebook executive in early November on the tech corporationā€™s decision to remove the page of an exiled Chinese expatriate now residing in N.Y.,Ā while implying the act of censorship may have been carried out due to a desire to enter the massive foreign market.

ā€œWhat I want to be clear is, was there any pressure from the Chinese government to block his account?ā€ Rubio asked Facebook general counsel Colin Stretch.

ā€œNo senator, we reviewed a report on that account and analyzed it through regular channels using our regular procedures,ā€ Stretch responded. ā€œThe blocking was not of the account in its entirety, but I believe was a specific post that violated our policy.ā€

Rubioā€™s office did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundationā€™s request for further comment by time of publication.

Follow Eric on Twitter

Send tips toĀ [email protected].

The Daily Caller News Foundation is working hard to balance out the biased American media. For as little as $3, you can help us. Freedom of speech isnā€™t free.Ā Make a one-time donation to support the quality, independent journalism of the Daily Caller News Foundation. Weā€™re not dependent on commercial or political support and we do not accept any government funding.

Ā For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contactĀ [email protected].

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the āˆØ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles