NY Times uses ‘tantalizing’ headline to dump the biggest nothing-burger yet on Neil Gorsuch

Kevin Daley, DCNF

An ominous headline lurks on the front page of Wednesday’s New York Times, tantalizing readers with word of Judge Neil Gorsuch’s “web of ties” to a “secretive billionaire.”

The Times reports that Gorsuch, President Donald Trump’s nominee to succeed the late Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court, has something of a patron in Philip Anschutz. Anschutz’s net worth is $12.6 billion. He’s an investments magnate who leverages his fortune to finance conservative groups, including the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society.

Gorsuch’s ties to Anschutz prove far less interesting than the headline suggests. The judge was retained to represent Anschutz when he was an attorney in private practice at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, an elite boutique operation based in Washington, D.C. In this capacity, Gorsuch represented several of the billionaire’s companies as well as their corporate officers. A review of these cases conducted by the Times shows the work consisted of garden-variety litigation. The most interesting case appears to be a dispute over a $710 million extraordinary dividend.

One of the firm’s partners, Mark Hansen, told the Times Gorsuch was assigned the work “because of his skills and experience and because he had expressed to me an interest in getting involved in things relating to his home state.” Anschutz, like Gorsuch, is based in Colorado.

Another lawyer representing the billionaire, Bruce Black, wrote a letter to the George W. Bush administration’s White House Counsel, Harriet Myers, in Jan. 2006, asking the White House to consider Gorsuch for a seat on the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. That federal appeals court is based in Denver. Gorsuch secured the appointment and was unanimously confirmed by the Senate later that year, but it is unclear what role, if any, Black’s letter played in the White House’s selection process.

Aside from these fairly unremarkable revelations, the Times raises the prospect of conflicts of interest, should Gorsuch win confirmation to the Supreme Court. As Anschutz’s many companies sprawl across dozens of industries and states, it is conceivable litigation involving his business interests would one day appear before the high court. His previous work, they fear, could undercut his impartiality, or at least create the appearance of impropriety.

But as The National Law Journal’s Tony Mauro recently showed, Gorsuch has assiduously adhered to ethics rules during his tenure on the 10th Circuit. He has recused himself from over 1,000 cases, often on the basis that they involved a former client or colleague. The Times itself concedes there is no reason to believe this would change should Gorsuch join the Supreme Court.

The piece concludes by noting that Gorsuch and two individuals the Times describes as Anschutz’s “top lieutenants” jointly own land in Colorado, which they use as something of a secluded fly-fishing getaway. The judge is an avid outdoorsman — he was skiing the Rockies when he learned of Scalia’s death in February 2016.

Perhaps the most interesting revelation in the piece is its remarkable concession in the sixth graph.

“But it is not clear how well the two know each other,” the Times writes of the judge and the billionaire, as if to apologize for the forthcoming banality.

Follow Kevin on Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Latest Articles