Liberals only want you to say what they want to hear. Disgraced former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz was blasted on Twitter after saying it’s too early to discuss impeaching President Trump.
Wasserman Schultz parroted the Democratic talking points claiming Trump aides had colluded with Russia to influence the election, but stopped short of saying the president should be impeached.
“That requires an independent, bipartisan investigation,” Wasserman Schultz told CNN.
.@DWStweets tells @ErinBurnett it’s not yet time to talk about impeachment https://t.co/7ryr0iwsYg https://t.co/Zsfu18QSOj
— OutFrontCNN (@OutFrontCNN) February 16, 2017
Wasserman Schultz is absolutely correct: It is way too early to discuss impeachment. You can’t impeach a president simply because you don’t like him — a point that’s lost at clueless liberals.
A president can be impeached for treason, bribery or other “high crimes and misdemeanors.” There is no evidence that Trump has committed any of these offenses. Annoying a sensitive snowflake is not cause for impeachment.
And, as any lawyer will tell you: It doesn’t matter what you BELIEVE; it only matters what you can prove. Just ask Tom Cruise.
So far, impeachment is only being discussed among pitchfork-wielding radical leftists like California Congresswoman Maxine Waters, who thinks Russia invaded Korea.
Impeachment also requires a majority vote of the House of Representatives. Since Republicans make up the majority, good luck getting the votes, Dems!
Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned as chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee in July 2016 after leaked emails suggested the Democratic Party had colluded with Hillary Clinton’s camp to rig the primary race against Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Angry liberals skewered Debbie Wasserman Schultz on Twitter for refusing to hop on the Trump impeachment bandwagon.
Please stop lending legitimacy to the disgraced, unethical @DWStweets ;she's lost all credibility! #DEMExit
— K~OM (@niall15) February 16, 2017
DWS needs to be replaced. She is a disgrace.
— ProudMary (@ProudMary4) February 16, 2017
Why would DWS be considered a reliable source of info? Lied and cheated at DNC. No Trust there
— Ravenrider (@Ravenriderxtr) February 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/The_Smirker/status/832047880777064448
One lone honest anti-Trumper said she can’t stand Wasserman Schultz, but the congresswoman is right.
@AC360 @DWStweets @ErinBurnett @CNN She's right. And she she also still makes me sick to my stomach and should go away!
— ceehope (@ceehope) February 16, 2017
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- DOJ attorney in charge of election-crimes unit quits after AG Barr opens investigation - November 10, 2020
- ‘Whoa, whoa, whoa’: Neil Cavuto slammed after he cuts off Kayleigh McEnany presser - November 10, 2020
- Same media that cheered Stacey Abrams, Al Gore for refusing to concede attack Trump for same move - November 8, 2020
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!